These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7662083)

  • 1. [The context effect in speech recognition of sentences].
    Züst HJ; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Jun; 74(6):375-9. PubMed ID: 7662083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Context effects in speech recognition of sentences].
    Züst HJ; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Apr; 74(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 7772229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of context on speech understanding ability using German sentence test materials.
    Züst H; Tschopp K
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 8146590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of linguistic competence on speech audiometry results using the Basel Sentence Test].
    von Werra P; Tschopp K; Schneider R
    HNO; 1995 Feb; 43(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 7713772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Context and Hearing Loss on Time-Gated Word Recognition in Children.
    Lewis D; Kopun J; McCreery R; Brennan M; Nishi K; Cordrey E; Stelmachowicz P; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e180-e192. PubMed ID: 28045838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking.
    Rählmann S; Meister H
    HNO; 2017 Aug; 65(Suppl 2):109-115. PubMed ID: 28224173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA; Fidan D; Türkyılmaz D; Hochmuth S; Ergenç İ; Sennaroğlu G; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.
    Schurman J; Brungart D; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3337. PubMed ID: 25480078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of context effects in sentence recognition.
    Bronkhorst AW; Brand T; Wagener K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2874-86. PubMed ID: 12083221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Sharvard Corpus: a phonemically-balanced Spanish sentence resource for audiology.
    Aubanel V; Lecumberri ML; Cooke M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):633-8. PubMed ID: 24863133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):2145-7. PubMed ID: 3429736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests.
    Hochmuth S; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Jürgens T
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():62-70. PubMed ID: 26097982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Perception: Phonological Neighborhood Effects on Word Recognition Persist Despite Semantic Sentence Context.
    Cervera-Crespo T; González-Álvarez J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2019 Dec; 126(6):1047-1057. PubMed ID: 31412741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset.
    Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 May; 19():. PubMed ID: 25964195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.