These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7662751)

  • 1. The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning.
    Segreto J
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1995 Jun; 20(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 7662751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of frontal EMG biofeedback and neck EMG biofeedback in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache.
    Hart JD; Cichanski KA
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Mar; 6(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 7260182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of noncontingent feedback on EMG training, EMG responses, and subjective experience.
    Segreto-Bures J; Kotses H
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1984 Mar; 9(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 6487672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of alternative control procedures for electromyographic biofeedback relaxation training.
    Kiffer JJ; Fridlund AJ; Fowler SC
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Jun; 6(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 7020778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electromyographic biofeedback for tension control during fine motor skill acquisition.
    French SN
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1980 Jun; 5(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 7397276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of noncontingent feedback in EMG biofeedback.
    Burnette MM; Adams HE
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1987 Dec; 12(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 3454219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Change mechanisms in EMG biofeedback training: cognitive changes underlying improvements in tension headache.
    Rains JC
    Headache; 2008 May; 48(5):735-6; discussion 736-7. PubMed ID: 18471128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acquisition of the control of a novel muscular activity by electromyograph biofeedback].
    Koga S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1988 Aug; 59(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 3236582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feedback delays and relaxation expectancies in EMG biofeedback.
    Monsma BR; Glaros AG; Lumley MA
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1988 Jun; 13(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 3061472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in digital temperature during frontal EMG biofeedback training in normal subjects.
    Montgomery GT
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1988 Jun; 13(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 3061474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofeedback modification of frontal EMG in normal subjects.
    Ohno Y; Tanaka Y; Takeya T; Matsubara H; Kuriya N; Komemushi S
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1978 Mar; 3(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 667192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electromyographic study of motor learning for a voice production task.
    Yiu EM; Verdolini K; Chow LP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 48(6):1254-68. PubMed ID: 16478369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task performance and electromyopotential as functions of task difficulty and EMG feedback.
    Connally RE; Dieter JN; Uliano K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 3503266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: of signal or process?
    Staudenmayer H; Kinsman RA
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1976 Jun; 1(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 990348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of auditory and visual feedback for EMG training.
    Gaudette M; Prins A; Kahane J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 6866648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectancies of reinforcement control in biofeedback and cognitive performance.
    Carlson JG; Feld JL
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Mar; 6(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 7260183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biofeedback effect on electromyography responses in patients with spinal cord injury.
    Brucker BS; Bulaeva NV
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1996 Feb; 77(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 8607736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The response of manual motor functioning in Parkinsonians to frontal EMG biofeedback and progressive relaxation.
    Shumaker RG
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1980 Jun; 5(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 6994824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalization of lowered EMG levels during musical performance following biofeedback training.
    Morasky RL; Reynolds C; Sowell LE
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1983 Jun; 8(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 6639976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of EMG biofeedback and progressive muscle relaxation training on awareness of frontalis muscle tension.
    Sime WE; DeGood DE
    Psychophysiology; 1977 Nov; 14(6):522-30. PubMed ID: 337338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.