BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7662858)

  • 1. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):764-76. PubMed ID: 7662858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of some methods for fitting dose-response models to quantal-response developmental toxicology data.
    Carr GJ; Portier CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):779-91. PubMed ID: 8241373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology.
    Kupper LL; Portier C; Hogan MD; Yamamoto E
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 3719065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data.
    George EO; Bowman D
    Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):512-23. PubMed ID: 7662840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating variance functions in developmental toxicity studies.
    Bowman D; Chen JJ; George EO
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1523-8. PubMed ID: 8589237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments.
    Liang KY; Hanfelt J
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):872-80. PubMed ID: 7981409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation bias using the beta-binomial distribution in teratology.
    Williams DA
    Biometrics; 1988 Mar; 44(1):305-9. PubMed ID: 3358995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose-dependent number of implants and implications in developmental toxicity.
    Dunson DB
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):558-69. PubMed ID: 9629644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A shared response model for clustered binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Pang Z; Kuk AY
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):1076-84. PubMed ID: 16401281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new threshold dose-response model including random effects for data from developmental toxicity studies.
    Hunt DL; Rai SN
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 16092077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regression models for clustered binary responses: implications of ignoring the intracluster correlation in an analysis of perinatal mortality in twin gestations.
    Ananth CV; Platt RW; Savitz DA
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 15(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 15780777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust estimation of the variance in moment methods for extra-binomial and extra-Poisson variation.
    Moore DF; Tsiatis A
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):383-401. PubMed ID: 1912253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of trinomial responses from reproductive and developmental toxicity experiments.
    Chen JJ; Kodell RL; Howe RB; Gaylor DW
    Biometrics; 1991 Sep; 47(3):1049-58. PubMed ID: 1742429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data.
    Rao JN; Scott AJ
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):577-85. PubMed ID: 1637980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.
    Kupper LL; Haseman JK
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 564719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random effects probit and logistic regression models for three-level data.
    Gibbons RD; Hedeker D
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1527-37. PubMed ID: 9423267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of retrospective sampling on binary regression models for clustered data.
    Neuhaus JM; Jewell NP
    Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2085642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.