These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7662904)

  • 1. Mismatch negativity (MMN) is altered by directing attention.
    Oades RD; Dittmann-Balcar A
    Neuroreport; 1995 May; 6(8):1187-90. PubMed ID: 7662904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The spatio-temporal dynamics of deviance and target detection in the passive and active auditory oddball paradigm: a sLORETA study.
    Justen C; Herbert C
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 19(1):25. PubMed ID: 29673322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
    Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.
    Alho K; Woods DL; Algazi A; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 May; 82(5):356-68. PubMed ID: 1374704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.
    Escera C; Alho K; Winkler I; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Sep; 10(5):590-604. PubMed ID: 9802992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From spatial acoustic changes to attentive behavioral responses within 200 ms in humans.
    Ruusuvirta T
    Neurosci Lett; 1999 Nov; 275(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 10554982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
    Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation of mismatch negativity by stimulus deviance and modality of attention.
    Müller BW; Achenbach C; Oades RD; Bender S; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 2002 Jul; 13(10):1317-20. PubMed ID: 12151795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mismatch negativity of higher amplitude for melodic ascendance than descendance.
    Ruusuvirta TT; Astikainen P
    Neuroreport; 2012 Mar; 23(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 22246244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stability of the mismatch negativity under different stimulus and attention conditions.
    Kathmann N; Frodl-Bauch T; Hegerl U
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Feb; 110(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 10210621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mismatch negativity and N2b attenuation as an indicator for dysfunction of the preattentive and controlled processing for deviance detection in schizophrenia: a topographic event-related potential study.
    Kasai K; Okazawa K; Nakagome K; Hiramatsu K; Hata A; Fukuda M; Honda M; Miyauchi M; Matsushita M
    Schizophr Res; 1999 Jan; 35(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 9988851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.