These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7663331)

  • 1. Points of a normal visual field are not statistically independent.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kiermeir U; Kojetinsky S
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 4(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7663331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals.
    Casson EJ; Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 34(11):3096-102. PubMed ID: 8407217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kojetinsky S; Ostermaier N; Angstwurm K; Vivell PM; Schaumberger M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical aspects of the normal visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM; Cubbidge RP; Pacey IE; Robinson R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Jan; 39(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 9430545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
    Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
    Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Reduction of retinal light sensitivity in diabetic patients].
    Pahor D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):868-72. PubMed ID: 14704945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Tanakadate A; Ishikawa S
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical modelling of the central 10-degree visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Cubbidge RP; Hosking SL; Embleton S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):650-7. PubMed ID: 12192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Lewis RA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 Sep; 30(9):2056-64. PubMed ID: 2777523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study.
    Topouzis F; Coleman AL; Yu F; Mavroudis L; Anastasopoulos E; Koskosas A; Pappas T; Dimitrakos S; Wilson MR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 15013863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the temporal hemifield and nasal hemifield sensitivity in patients with early-onset convergent strabismus.
    Polati M; Malta RF; Alves CA
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(4):181-91. PubMed ID: 18058354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects.
    Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.