115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7665202)
1. Assessing the shape of root canals: an in vitro method using microradiography.
Thompson SA; al-Omari AO; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 1995 Mar; 28(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 7665202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between two ultrasonic units in shaping curved canals in teeth using macroradiography.
Ahmad M
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1991 Apr; 7(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 1782894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
Ong EY; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
Pratten DH; McDonald NJ
J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparative study of the clinical, electrical and radiologic methods of measuring the length of root canals].
Andreescu C; Puchită M; Iliescu A; Popa B; Luca R; Vasiliu M; Jovin C; Popadiuc M; Rădulescu M; Mitroi MT
Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Stomatol; 1984; 31(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 6240732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Eccentric projection for the observation of the root canals of the upper premolars].
Shimano T; Hirota S; Omochi M; Daibo M
Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Nov; 17(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 2132322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Determination of the apical limits of instrumentation by subtraction using the paralleling radiographic technic. (Study contribution)].
Solbo LJ; Pesce HF; Bombana AC
Rev Faculdade Odontol FZL; 1989; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 2701074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Root canal preparation with Endo-Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Barbakow F; Peters OA
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):456-64. PubMed ID: 15946266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative clinical study in methods of measuring the length of root canals in endodontic treatment].
Laura Pinna M; Argiolas M; Meloni PF; Pinna G
Attual Dent; 1988 Nov; 4(38):44. PubMed ID: 3271402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Electronic conductometry in endodontics. A developing technique].
António PS; Leopoldo FN; Carmen LP
Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1991; 31(4):247-51. PubMed ID: 2041976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2006 Mar; 39(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16507074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of a contrast medium as an adjunct to endodontic radiography.
Bedford JM; Martin DM; Youngson CC
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):806-13. PubMed ID: 15548270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of different hand instruments on the shape of the root canal].
Briseño B; Sonnabend E; Detzer F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 2630268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
