These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7665202)

  • 21. An in vitro method for comparing the effects of different root canal preparation techniques on the shape of curved root canals.
    Tang MP; Stock CJ
    Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 2599661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The radiographic platform: a new method to evaluate root canal preparation in vitro.
    Sydney GB; Batista A; de Melo LL
    J Endod; 1991 Nov; 17(11):570-2. PubMed ID: 1812207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography.
    Peters OA; Laib A; Göhring TN; Barbakow F
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11487156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography.
    Mentes A; Gencoglu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):88-91. PubMed ID: 11805781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report.
    Kottoor J; Velmurugan N; Sudha R; Hemamalathi S
    J Endod; 2010 May; 36(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 20416446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Proportional length determination: mathematical method.
    Pink FE; Sachs E
    Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):428-31; quiz 433-4. PubMed ID: 7489875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
    Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
    Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [In vitro comparative study of instruments for root canal preparation. IV. Correlations between the original shape of the root canal and the asymmetry resulting from the preparation].
    Bartha K; Dobó NC; Bernáth M; Szabó J
    Fogorv Sz; 1996 Jan; 89(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 8713616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals.
    Burger CL; Mork TO; Hutter JW; Nicoll B
    J Endod; 1999 Apr; 25(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 10425952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parallel post-space preparation in different tooth types ex vivo: deviation from the canal centre and remaining dentine thickness.
    Huysmans MC; Klein MH; Kok GF; Whitworth JM
    Int Endod J; 2007 Oct; 40(10):778-85. PubMed ID: 17697109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
    López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
    Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ex vivo investigation on the postoperative integrity of the apical constriction after the sole use of electronic working length determination.
    Wolgin M; Grundmann MJ; Tchorz JP; Frank W; Kielbassa AM
    J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():52-57. PubMed ID: 28642058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Working length in root canal fillings.
    Pagan JC; Santa CA; Alvarez JA
    N Y State Dent J; 1993 Nov; 59(9):41-3. PubMed ID: 8247456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical method to determine the optimal apical preparation size. Part I.
    Weiger R; Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17052648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Dental radiography during root canal measurement].
    Muraoka H
    Shikai Tenbo; 1985 Sep; 66(3):658-61. PubMed ID: 3868139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparative study of conventional radiography and Root ZX apex locator in determining root canal working length.
    Javidi M; Moradi S; Rashed R; Raziee L
    N Y State Dent J; 2009; 75(4):48-51. PubMed ID: 19722483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator.
    Shabahang S; Goon WW; Gluskin AH
    J Endod; 1996 Nov; 22(11):616-8. PubMed ID: 9198419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.