These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7666706)

  • 1. Methodological issues of patient utility measurement. Experience from two clinical trials.
    Rutten-van Mölken MP; Bakker CH; van Doorslaer EK; van der Linden S
    Med Care; 1995 Sep; 33(9):922-37. PubMed ID: 7666706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of utility assessment by rating scale and standard gamble in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Feb; 21(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 8182636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient utilities in ankylosing spondylitis and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten-van Mölken M; Hidding A; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1298-304. PubMed ID: 7966073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1536-43. PubMed ID: 7473480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between health utility and psychometric health status measures.
    Revicki DA
    Med Care; 1992 May; 30(5 Suppl):MS274-82. PubMed ID: 1583939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient utilities in chronic musculoskeletal pain: how useful is the standard gamble method?
    Goossens ME; Vlaeyen JW; Rutten-van Mölken MP; van der Linden SM
    Pain; 1999 Mar; 80(1-2):365-75. PubMed ID: 10204750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference-based measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in children with chronic musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs).
    Brunner HI; Maker D; Grundland B; Young NL; Blanchette V; Stain AM; Feldman BM
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12926581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Problem elicitation to assess patient priorities in ankylosing spondylitis and fibromyalgia.
    Bakker C; van der Linden S; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; Hidding A
    J Rheumatol; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1304-10. PubMed ID: 7562763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The stability of utility scores: test-retest reliability and the interpretation of utility scores in elective total hip arthroplasty.
    Feeny D; Blanchard CM; Mahon JL; Bourne R; Rorabeck C; Stitt L; Webster-Bogaert S
    Qual Life Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15058783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development, feasibility, and validity of a computer-based utility assessment tool for measuring asthma-specific health utilities in Malaysia using the standard gamble method.
    Yong YV; Shafie AA
    J Asthma; 2016 Oct; 53(8):835-42. PubMed ID: 27049693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease.
    Clarke AE; Goldstein MK; Michelson D; Garber AM; Lenert LA
    Qual Life Res; 1997 Mar; 6(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 9161117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical trial to evaluate the measurement properties of 2 direct preference instruments administered with and without hypothetical marker states.
    Schünemann HJ; Griffith L; Stubbing D; Goldstein R; Guyatt GH
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 12693876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the preferences of patients with psoriasis. A quantitative, utility approach.
    Zug KA; Littenberg B; Baughman RD; Kneeland T; Nease RF; Sumner W; O'Connor GT; Jones R; Morrison E; Cimis R
    Arch Dermatol; 1995 May; 131(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 7741543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard.
    Giesler RB; Ashton CM; Brody B; Byrne MM; Cook K; Geraci JM; Hanita M; Souchek J; Wray NP
    Med Care; 1999 Jun; 37(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 10386570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing health utilities in schizophrenia. A feasibility study.
    Voruganti LN; Awad AG; Oyewumi LK; Cortese L; Zirul S; Dhawan R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2000 Mar; 17(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 10947302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability and internal consistency of an Internet-capable computer program for measuring utilities.
    Lenert LA
    Qual Life Res; 2000; 9(7):811-7. PubMed ID: 11297023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons.
    Feeny D; Furlong W; Saigal S; Sun J
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Feb; 58(4):799-809. PubMed ID: 14672594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases.
    Lee BS; Kymes SM; Nease RF; Sumner W; Siegfried CJ; Gordon MO
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):898-903.e4. PubMed ID: 17826833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility and reliability of a mailed questionnaire to obtain visual analogue scale valuations for health states defined by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3.
    Raat H; Bonsel GJ; Hoogeveen WC; Essink-Bot ML;
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14713735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff.
    Jansen SJ; Stiggelbout AM; Wakker PP; Vliet Vlieland TP; Leer JW; Nooy MA; Kievit J
    Med Decis Making; 1998; 18(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 10372581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.