These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7666749)

  • 1. Silicone breast implant litigation (Part 2).
    Shiffman MA
    Med Law; 1995; 14(1-2):59-85. PubMed ID: 7666749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The silicone breast implant controversy. A LNCs experience with silicone breast implant litigation.
    Montgomery B
    Natl Med Leg J; 1995; 6(2):3. PubMed ID: 7612778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silicone breast implants. Can emerging medical, legal, and scientific concepts be reconciled?
    Snyder JW
    J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):133-220. PubMed ID: 9230567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Product liability implications of biomaterials in the United States.
    Price JM
    Clin Mater; 1994; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 10184317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class actions in breast implant litigation.
    Peerless MJ; Eizenga MA
    Health Law Can; 1996 Feb; 16(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 10173416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Silicone breast implant litigation (Part 1).
    Shiffman MA
    Med Law; 1994; 13(7-8):681-716. PubMed ID: 7731351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The silicone breast implant controversy. Silicone toxicity and autoimmunity.
    Brautbar N
    Natl Med Leg J; 1995; 6(2):1, 4-7. PubMed ID: 7612777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The silicone breast implant controversy.
    Guerette PH
    Can Nurse; 1995 Feb; 91(2):31-7. PubMed ID: 7780923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Daubert and the breast implant litigation: how is the judiciary addressing the science?
    Reed ME
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Oct; 100(5):1322-6. PubMed ID: 9326800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Silicone and silliness. Probabilistic prevarication in the legal arena.
    Caldwell JR
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Sep; 81(9):596-8. PubMed ID: 7964587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dismissing the evidence: the medical response to women with silicone implant-related disorders.
    Dumble LJ
    Health Care Women Int; 1996; 17(6):515-25. PubMed ID: 9119771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science in the courtroom. A new approach.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10420302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of FDA policy on silicone breast implants: a case study of politics, bureaucracy, and business in the process of decision-making.
    Palley HA
    Int J Health Serv; 1995; 25(4):573-91. PubMed ID: 8575864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do silicone breast implants cause connective tissue disease?
    Cooper C; Dennison E
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):403-4. PubMed ID: 9492648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast-implant ruling sends a message.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Jan; 275(5296):21. PubMed ID: 8999526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of silicone as a biomaterial.
    Lee GM
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Apr; 6(3):20-5. PubMed ID: 10172444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal developments in healthcare.
    Holubitsky DJ
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1996; 5(4):30-3. PubMed ID: 10159552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The regulatory process, the Food and Drug Administration, and the silicone breast implant controversy.
    Palley HA; Palley ML
    J Health Soc Policy; 1999; 11(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10538427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Silicone breast implants: implications for society and surgeons.
    Renwick SB
    Med J Aust; 1996 Sep; 165(6):338-41. PubMed ID: 8862336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review that found PIP implants to be safe was flawed, say campaigners.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f3034. PubMed ID: 23661251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.