348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7666761)
1. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: an analysis with event-related potentials.
Mecklinger A; Schriefers H; Steinhauer K; Friederici AD
Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):477-94. PubMed ID: 7666761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semantic and syntactic processes during sentence comprehension in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from event-related potentials.
Ruchsow M; Trippel N; Groen G; Spitzer M; Kiefer M
Schizophr Res; 2003 Nov; 64(2-3):147-56. PubMed ID: 14613679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words.
Van Petten C; Kutas M
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 2017035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of processing requirements on neurophysiological responses to spoken sentences.
Connolly JF; Stewart SH; Phillips NA
Brain Lang; 1990 Aug; 39(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 2224497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences.
Weckerly J; Kutas M
Psychophysiology; 1999 Sep; 36(5):559-70. PubMed ID: 10442024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Word order in sentence processing: an experimental study of verb placement in German.
Weyerts H; Penke M; Münte TF; Heinze HJ; Clahsen H
J Psycholinguist Res; 2002 May; 31(3):211-68. PubMed ID: 12092710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times.
Kounios J; Holcomb PJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1992 Dec; 121(4):459-79. PubMed ID: 1431739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence comprehension: An ERP study.
Ding J; Wang L; Yang Y
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 26833049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task.
Holcomb PJ; McPherson WB
Brain Cogn; 1994 Mar; 24(2):259-76. PubMed ID: 8185897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses.
Spivey-Knowlton MJ; Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK
Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):276-309. PubMed ID: 8364532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.
Di Domenico A; Di Matteo R
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 19943612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological insights into language processing in schizophrenia.
Sitnikova T; Salisbury DF; Kuperberg G; Holcomb PI
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 12462512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ahead of time: Early sentence slow cortical modulations associated to semantic prediction.
León-Cabrera P; Flores A; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Morís J
Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():192-201. PubMed ID: 30625396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.
Kuperberg GR; Sitnikova T; Caplan D; Holcomb PJ
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jun; 17(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 12763198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: an eye-tracking study.
Betancort M; Carreiras M; Sturt P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1915-29. PubMed ID: 19424908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses.
Friederici AD; Steinhauer K; Mecklinger A; Meyer M
Biol Psychol; 1998 Mar; 47(3):193-221. PubMed ID: 9564450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
