These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7666761)

  • 41. Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.
    Isel F; Hahne A; Maess B; Friederici AD
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 17011692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Kuperberg GR; Kreher DA; Sitnikova T; Caplan DN; Holcomb PJ
    Brain Lang; 2007 Mar; 100(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 16546247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Local and global semantic integration in an argument structure: ERP evidence from Korean.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 1642():590-602. PubMed ID: 27095512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is there a difference between stripy journeys and stripy ladybirds? The N400 response to semantic and world-knowledge violations during sentence processing.
    Dudschig C; Maienborn C; Kaup B
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():38-49. PubMed ID: 26812249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.
    Kutas M; Hillyard SA
    Biol Psychol; 1980 Sep; 11(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 7272388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance.
    Deacon D; Breton F; Ritter W; Vaughan HG
    Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 1946885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing.
    Holcomb PJ
    Psychophysiology; 1993 Jan; 30(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 8416062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. P300 evoked by an auditory and a visual paradigm and a semantic task.
    Dierks T; Maurer K
    Psychiatry Res; 1989 Sep; 29(3):439-41. PubMed ID: 2608814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences.
    Malaia E; Wilbur RB; Weber-Fox C
    Brain Lang; 2009 Mar; 108(3):145-58. PubMed ID: 18945484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.
    Van Petten C; Kutas M
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):380-93. PubMed ID: 2381317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of local and global context on processing sentences with subject and object relative clauses.
    Yang F; Mo L; Louwerse MM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2013 Jun; 42(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 22485022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study.
    Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
    He W; Xu N; Ji R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Syntactic and referential processes in second-language learners: event-related brain potential evidence.
    Isel F
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1885-9. PubMed ID: 18007180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. N200, N250r, and N400 event-related brain potentials reveal three loci of repetition priming for familiar names.
    Pickering EC; Schweinberger SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1298-311. PubMed ID: 14622062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces.
    Barrett SE; Rugg MD
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(7):913-22. PubMed ID: 2771030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Semantic categorization and event-related potentials.
    Polich J
    Brain Lang; 1985 Nov; 26(2):304-21. PubMed ID: 4084767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian "who"-questions: a study with event-related potentials.
    Penolazzi B; De Vincenzi M; Angrilli A; Job R
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 15740843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.