These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7667794)

  • 1. Diet optimization with a nutrient or toxin constraint.
    Hirakawa H
    Theor Popul Biol; 1995 Jun; 47(3):331-46. PubMed ID: 7667794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should "handled" prey be considered? Some consequences for functional response, predator-prey dynamics and optimal foraging theory.
    Krivan V; Vrkoc I
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Mar; 227(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 14990381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Size and scaling of predator-prey dynamics.
    Weitz JS; Levin SA
    Ecol Lett; 2006 May; 9(5):548-57. PubMed ID: 16643300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diet selection in a molluscivore shorebird across Western Europe: does it show short- or long-term intake rate-maximization?
    Quaintenne G; van Gils JA; Bocher P; Dekinga A; Piersma T
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 19674177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary stability of optimal foraging: partial preferences in the diet and patch models.
    Křivan V
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Dec; 267(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 20863839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mechanistic model for partial preferences.
    Berec L; Krivan V
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Dec; 58(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 11162787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.
    Ma BO; Abrams PA; Brassil CE
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):668-84. PubMed ID: 14618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predation, competition, and nutrient recycling: a stoichiometric approach with multiple nutrients.
    Grover JP
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Jul; 229(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15178183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of variable stoichiometry on predator-prey interactions: a multinutrient approach.
    Grover JP
    Am Nat; 2003 Jul; 162(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 12856235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal foraging and predator-prey dynamics, II.
    Krivan V; Sikder A
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Apr; 55(2):111-26. PubMed ID: 10329511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of nutrient bound of prey on the dynamics of predator-mediated competitive-coexistence.
    Roy S; Alam S; Chattopadhyay J
    Biosystems; 2005 Nov; 82(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 16112387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prey selection, vertical migrations and the impacts of harvesting upon the population dynamics of a predator-prey system.
    Edwards HJ; Dytham C; Pitchford JW; Righton D
    Bull Math Biol; 2007 Aug; 69(6):1827-46. PubMed ID: 17443393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prey-predator system with parental care for predators.
    Wang W; Takeuchi Y; Saito Y; Nakaoka S
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 16414079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enrichment and stability: a phenomenological coupling of energy value and carrying capacity.
    Roy S; Chattopadhyay J
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):371-8. PubMed ID: 17092634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of prey density on foraging mode selection in juvenile lumpfish: balancing food intake with the metabolic cost of foraging.
    Killen SS; Brown JA; Gamperl AK
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jul; 76(4):814-25. PubMed ID: 17584387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directed movement of predators and the emergence of density-dependence in predator-prey models.
    Arditi R; Tyutyunov Y; Morgulis A; Govorukhin V; Senina I
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 May; 59(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 11444960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The interplay between predator's prey preference and environmental heterogeneity in food web long-term stability.
    Faria Ldel B; da Silveira Costa MI
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jun; 258(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 18621063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
    Sherratt TN; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2004 May; 228(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 15094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.