These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7667929)

  • 1. Attentional effort modulated by task difficulty.
    Urbach D; Spitzer H
    Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(15):2169-77. PubMed ID: 7667929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of attentional spread and attentional effort on orientation discrimination.
    Sade A; Spitzer H
    Spat Vis; 1998; 11(4):367-83. PubMed ID: 9749986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The time course of pattern discrimination in the human brain.
    Harauzov AK; Shelepin YE; Noskov YA; Vasilev PP; Foreman NP
    Vision Res; 2016 Aug; 125():55-63. PubMed ID: 27291935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S; Han S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trial history effects in the ventral attentional network.
    Scalf PE; Ahn J; Beck DM; Lleras A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2789-97. PubMed ID: 24960047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configuration-specific attentional modulation of flanker- -target lateral interactions.
    Freeman E; Sagi D; Driver J
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 15109161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial attention increases performance but not subjective confidence in a discrimination task.
    Wilimzig C; Tsuchiya N; Fahle M; Einhäuser W; Koch C
    J Vis; 2008 May; 8(5):7.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention.
    Rossi AF; Paradiso MA
    Vision Res; 1995 Mar; 35(5):621-34. PubMed ID: 7900301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation repulsion and attraction in alignment perception.
    Tzvetanov T; Wirmer A; Folta K
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1693-704. PubMed ID: 17451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings.
    Heeley DW; Timney B
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(2):337-44. PubMed ID: 3414021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prestimulus oscillations in the alpha band of the EEG are modulated by the difficulty of feature discrimination and predict activation of a sensory discrimination process.
    Roberts DM; Fedota JR; Buzzell GA; Parasuraman R; McDonald CG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 26(8):1615-28. PubMed ID: 24405187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of short-term training on cardinal and oblique orientation discrimination: an ERP study.
    Song Y; Sun L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Kang J; Ma X; Yang B; Guan Y; Ding Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 19995581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.