BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668175)

  • 21. Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selected obstetric surgical procedures.
    Chapman S; Duff P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 168(5):1354-7. PubMed ID: 8498411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Resistance of double-glove hole puncture indication systems to surgical needle puncture.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Hill LG; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 14510281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do surgeons use double gloves during surgery? Results of a survey.
    Walczak D; Grajek M; Pawełczak D; Żółtaszek A; Szumniak R; Czarnecki M; Trzeciak P; Krakowczyk Ł; Maciejewski A; Pasieka Z
    Pol Przegl Chir; 2020 Oct; 93(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 33729171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Double gloving and a glove perforation indication system during the dental treatment of HIV-positive patients: are they necessary?
    Avery CM; Gallagher P; Birnbaum W
    Br Dent J; 1999 Jan; 186(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 10028739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].
    Kralj N; Beie M; Hofmann F
    Gesundheitswesen; 1999; 61(8-9):398-403. PubMed ID: 10535220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Glove Perforation Rate in Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled Study To Evaluate the Efficacy of Double Gloving.
    Makama JG; Okeme IM; Makama EJ; Ameh EA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Aug; 17(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 26981792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.
    Chan KY; Singh VA; Oun BH; To BH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61 Suppl B():3-7. PubMed ID: 17605178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
    Murta EF; Silva CS; Júnior OR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 12768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
    Malhotra M; Sharma JB; Wadhwa L; Arora R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Aug; 30(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 15238110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Colored Indicator Undergloves Increase the Detection of Glove Perforations by Surgeons During Small Animal Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Meakin LB; Gilman OP; Parsons KJ; Burton NJ; Langley-Hobbs SJ
    Vet Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 27412490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations.
    Bennett B; Duff P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Dec; 78(6):1019-22. PubMed ID: 1945200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Glove perforation time and frequency in total hip arthroplasty procedures.
    Kaya I; Uğraş A; Sungur I; Yilmaz M; Korkmaz M; Cetinus E
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012; 46(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 22441453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.
    Caillot JL; Paparel P; Arnal E; Schreiber V; Voiglio EJ
    World J Surg; 2006 Jan; 30(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16369716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgeons' concern and practices of protection against bloodborne pathogens.
    Patterson JM; Novak CB; Mackinnon SE; Patterson GA
    Ann Surg; 1998 Aug; 228(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 9712573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Double gloving: a risk reduction strategy.
    Twomey CL
    Jt Comm J Qual Saf; 2003 Jul; 29(7):369-78. PubMed ID: 12856559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of surgical glove perforation after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.
    Walczak DA; Zakrzewski J; Pawelczak D; Grobelski B; Pasieka Z
    Acta Chir Belg; 2013; 113(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 24494469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of 4 different types of surgical gloves used for preventing blood contact.
    Wittmann A; Kralj N; Köver J; Gasthaus K; Lerch H; Hofmann F
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 May; 31(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 20334549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The risk of surgical glove perforations].
    Hagen GØ; Arntzen H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Mar; 127(7):856-8. PubMed ID: 17435804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.
    Gani JS; Anseline PF; Bissett RL
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 2327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is double gloving an effective barrier to protect surgeons against blood exposure due to needlestick injury?
    Bouvet E; Pellissier G; Abiteboul D; L'Hériteau F;
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 30(9):928-9; author reply 929. PubMed ID: 19653826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.