112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668603)
1. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of electrode configuration on threshold functions for electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ; Miller AL
Hear Res; 1995 May; 85(1-2):76-84. PubMed ID: 7559181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 10491953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. III. Pulse polarity.
Coste RL; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 May; 99(5):3099-108. PubMed ID: 8642120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: I. Sinusoidal stimuli.
Miller AL; Smith DW; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 134(1-2):89-104. PubMed ID: 10452379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study.
Mens LH; Berenstein CK
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):957-64. PubMed ID: 16151343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.
Boëx C; de Balthasar C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2049-57. PubMed ID: 14587604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation: IV. Activation pattern for sinusoidal stimulation.
Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):3190-204. PubMed ID: 12783954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants.
Drennan WR; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):170-9. PubMed ID: 15811709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tripolar configuration and pulse shape in cochlear implants reduce channel interactions in the temporal domain.
Quass GL; Kral A
Hear Res; 2024 Mar; 443():108953. PubMed ID: 38277881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. II: Frequency and interpulse interval.
Pfingst BE; Morris DJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1287-94. PubMed ID: 8408969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
