112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668603)
21. Effects of electrode configuration and stimulus level on rate and level discrimination with cochlear implants.
Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Nov; 1(3):211-23. PubMed ID: 11545227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation "20 + 2" implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation.
Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Ashbaugh C; Telian SA
Am J Otol; 1996 Sep; 17(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 8892567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Laneau J; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):73-86. PubMed ID: 15668040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Rebscher SJ; Snyder RL; Leake PA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2035-48. PubMed ID: 11386556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Spatial tuning curve recording in inferior colliculus during electrical stimulation of the cochlea].
Pan T; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 33(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 11717908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
Hoth S; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order in cochlear implants.
Miller AL; Morris DJ; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):21-33. PubMed ID: 9259233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses.
Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Borland J; Bertschy MR
J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):453-67. PubMed ID: 8783126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative psychophysical evaluation in cochlear implantation: electrical and magnetic stimulation.
Chen J; Hanusaik L; Ramses P; Schipp D; Anderson J; McLean A; Nedzelski J
Am J Otol; 1997 Jan; 18(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 8989950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds for electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat.
Beitel RE; Vollmer M; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Leake PA
Audiol Neurootol; 2000; 5(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10686430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of pulse separation on detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
Pfingst BE; Holloway LA; Razzaque SA
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 8880183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
Pfingst BE; Xu L
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.
Schoenecker MC; Bonham BH; Stakhovskaya OA; Snyder RL; Leake PA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):655-72. PubMed ID: 22722899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
