These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668604)

  • 21. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
    Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electrical resistivity measurements in the mammalian cochlea after neural degeneration.
    Micco AG; Richter CP
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1334-41. PubMed ID: 16885732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current density distributions, field distributions and impedance analysis of segmented deep brain stimulation electrodes.
    Wei XF; Grill WM
    J Neural Eng; 2005 Dec; 2(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 16317238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 19063955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of salicylate on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited in the first and third turns of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Goto K; Mori T; Suzuki H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 124(8):896-901. PubMed ID: 15513523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. K(+) currents produce P(1) in the RW CAP: evidence from DC current bias, K(+) channel blockade and recordings from cochlea and brainstem.
    Brown DJ; McMahon CM; Patuzzi RB
    Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 190(1-2):60-74. PubMed ID: 15051130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve.
    Black RC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 6892642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Impedance between modiolus and different walls of scala tympani].
    Du Q; Wang Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(19):878-9. PubMed ID: 19160859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Functional and morphologic changes in inner ear after experimental rupture of the round window membrane in the guinea pig].
    Ren J
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1991; 26(4):204-6, 251-2. PubMed ID: 1931176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrocochleography for different electrode positions in guinea pig.
    van Deelen GW; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1986; 101(3-4):207-16. PubMed ID: 3705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea.
    Nedzelnitsky V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1676-89. PubMed ID: 7462467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of electrical current configuration on stimulus detection.
    Pfingst BE; Miller AL; Morris DJ; Zwolan TA; Spelman FA; Clopton BM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():127-31. PubMed ID: 7668603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Determinants of the effectiveness of cochlear implants: I. Placement in the cochlea].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 11039219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Cochlear histopathological changes following chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in kittens].
    Ni D
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1993 Aug; 15(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 8168205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of cochlear histopathology following different approaches in guinea pigs and findings gained by regeneration material in humans.
    Kubik S; Banfai P; Wachsmuth C
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():53-9. PubMed ID: 6596853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effects of direct current on vibration of cochlear basilar membrane].
    Guo M
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 12761940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.
    van den Honert C; Kelsall DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3703-16. PubMed ID: 17552721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Histological study of chronic electrode implantation through the round window of the guinea pig.
    Gyo K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1988; 105(3-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 3389110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Evoked auditory potentials using electric stimulation of the ear. Experimental study].
    Charlet de Sauvage R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1983; 104(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 6878917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Discrimination of complex electrical stimulation through a multichannel intracochlear implant.
    Glass I; Spelman FA; Pfingst BE
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 1991; 2(1-2):87-102. PubMed ID: 1786260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.