These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668609)

  • 1. Back-telemetry and the Clarion cochlear prosthesis.
    Zilberman Y; Santogrossi T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():146-7. PubMed ID: 7668609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using impedance telemetry to diagnose cochlear electrode history, location, and functionality.
    Schulman JH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():85-7. PubMed ID: 7668768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance measurement of the Nucleus 22-electrode array in patients.
    Swanson B; Seligman P; Carter P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():141-4. PubMed ID: 7668607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of ionizing radiation on the CLARION 1.2 cochlear implant during radiation therapy.
    Baumann R; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Goldring JE; Gnadeberg D; Rittmann KL; Battmer RD; Karstens J; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 9918172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and functioning of the single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Danley MJ; Fretz RJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):21-6. PubMed ID: 6805393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Averaged electrode voltages in users of the Clarion cochlear implant device.
    Mens LH; Mulder JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2002 Apr; 111(4):370-5. PubMed ID: 11991591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Monitoring of implant electrode impedance].
    Petrov SM; Shchukina AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2011; (2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21512482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Shallop JK; Facer GW; Peterson A
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
    Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electron microscopy changes of cochlear implant electrodes with permanently high impedances.
    Durisin M; Krause C; Arnoldner C; Kontorinis G; Buechner A; Lenarz T; Lesinki-Schiedat A; Profant O; Neuburger J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Nov; 12(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 22251811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clarion cochlear implant: phase I investigational results.
    Schindler RA; Kessler DK; Haggerty HS
    Am J Otol; 1993 May; 14(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 8372924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.
    Mason S
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Biocompatibility of cochlear implants].
    Chouard CH; Pialoux P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Mar; 179(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 7648301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
    Duan YY; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.