These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668614)

  • 1. Assessment of a portable digital speech-rate converter for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Matsushima J; Sakai N; Imamura T; Ifukube T; Hokimoto T; Nejime Y
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():156-9. PubMed ID: 7668614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strengths and weaknesses of procedures for separating simultaneous voices.
    Summerfield Q; Stubbs RJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():91-100. PubMed ID: 2356742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Ways of using digital signal processing for expanding the potentials of hearing aids].
    Babkina LN; Molchanov AP
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):18-21. PubMed ID: 9752090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: differing polar patterns and acoustic environments.
    Amlani AM; Rakerd B; Punch JL
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 45(6):319-30. PubMed ID: 16777778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
    de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Alternatives to the conventional hearing aid: natural hearing quality with partial implant? (interview by Dr. Judith Neumaier)].
    Lenarz T
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Apr; 147(15):10. PubMed ID: 15884496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The digital hearing aid, wearable computing, and electrophysiological response.
    Doyle TE; Kucerovsky Z; Greason WD
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():129-34. PubMed ID: 12085589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directional hearing aids: then and now.
    Ricketts TA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4 Suppl 2):133-44. PubMed ID: 16470469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a customizable universal digital hearing aid.
    Magotra N; Livingston F; Rajagopalan S; Stewart J; Bricker K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():154-6. PubMed ID: 7668613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.