BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668625)

  • 1. Map dynamic ranges versus duration of hearing loss in cochlear implantees.
    Shim Y; Kim H; Chang M; Kim C
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():178-80. PubMed ID: 7668625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
    Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory capacity of hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and cochlear implants: issues of efficacy and assessment.
    Boothroyd A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 46():17-25. PubMed ID: 9309834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
    Laszig R
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: a comparison with normal-hearing age-mates.
    Uchanski RM; Geers AE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):90S-105S. PubMed ID: 12612484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
    van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implants.
    Ménard L; Polak M; Denny M; Burton E; Lane H; Matthies ML; Marrone N; Perkell JS; Tiede M; Vick J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3790-801. PubMed ID: 17552727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.