102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668633)
1. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of round-window psychophysical testing with cochlear-implant candidates.
Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
J Otolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 8064955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P; Smoorenburg GF
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
