These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668635)

  • 1. Preoperative assessment of function of the auditory nerve using electroaudiometry and a notched-noise auditory brain stem response technique.
    Wagner H; Gerhardt HJ; Stürzebecher E; Werbs M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():198-201. PubMed ID: 7668635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Brain stem potentials evoked by electric stimulation of the auditory nerve].
    Robier A; Le Scao Y
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991; 45(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 2063671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An objective evaluation of retrocochlear function by means of CNT (Cochlear Nerve Tester).
    Latkowski B; Gryczynski M; Jozwiak J; Krupa D; Makowski A; Komorowska A; Sidor W
    Panminerva Med; 1993 Dec; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8202331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR; Ruth RA; Thomas JF
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain stem evoked responses by intracochlear electric stimulation.
    Robier A; Lescao Y; Beutter P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1993; 48():120-4. PubMed ID: 8273465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Paired pulse discrimination test for evaluating auditory nerve function in deaf patients with cochlear prostheses].
    Yun JT; Chang Y; Wang ZZ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1986 Aug; 8(4):282-5. PubMed ID: 2953476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a promontory stimulation test using a transtympanic needle electrode with a test using an ear canal electrode.
    Khan S; Raine CH; Becconsall K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():190-2. PubMed ID: 7668631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploratory cochleotomy. Assessment of auditory nerve excitability and anatomical conditions in cochlear implant candidates.
    Montandon P; Kasper A; Pelizzone M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 1475098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J; Schön F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of different electrical stimulation conditions in preservation of spiral ganglion cells following deafness.
    Miller JM; Altschuler RA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():57-60. PubMed ID: 7668758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked potentials from the auditory nerve following sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea: new possibilities for preoperative testing in cochlear-implant candidates?
    Hartmann R; Pfennigdorff T; Klinke R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7825430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Current status of electrostimulation of auditory nerve fibers with cochlear implants].
    Burian K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1992; 142(11-12):264-73. PubMed ID: 1529619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activation of the auditory cortex by cochlear stimulation in a deaf patient.
    Pelizzone M; Hari R; Mäkelä J; Kaukoranta E; Montandon P
    Neurosci Lett; 1986 Jul; 68(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 3755811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrophysiological tests in the evaluation of selection for cochlear implants].
    Fraysse B; Vincent M; Corvera G; Estève-Fraysse MJ; Deguine O
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1991; 45(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 2063670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.