129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668647)
1. Musical pitch perception with pulsatile stimulation of single electrodes in patients implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Pijl S
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():224-7. PubMed ID: 7668647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes.
Pijl S; Schwarz DW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):886-95. PubMed ID: 7642827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
Limb CJ
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Event-related potentials with selected electrodes of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant.
Ash KR; Shallop JK
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():163-5. PubMed ID: 7668617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved music perception with explicit pitch coding in cochlear implants.
Laneau J; Wouters J; Moonen M
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 16219993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception.
Nardo WD; Cantore I; Cianfrone F; Melillo P; Fetoni AR; Paludetti G
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 17453456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intonation of musical intervals by musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Pijl S; Schwarz DW
Hear Res; 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 8600127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Claes A; Van Rompaey V; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved perception of music with a harmonic based algorithm for cochlear implants.
Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jul; 21(4):684-94. PubMed ID: 23613083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.
Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 17604582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
