These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668647)

  • 21. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Rubinstein JT
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2012 Feb; 45(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 22115686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Emotional response to music by postlingually-deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):879-81. PubMed ID: 23285951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
    McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. FMRI evidence for activation of multiple cortical regions in the primary auditory cortex of deaf subjects users of multichannel cochlear implants.
    Seghier ML; Boëx C; Lazeyras F; Sigrist A; Pelizzone M
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jan; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15238446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects.
    Pijl S
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):364-72. PubMed ID: 9360860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of pitch perception from a monopolar cochlear implant.
    Smith L
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1988; 24():153-9. PubMed ID: 3378090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial results with simultaneous analog and pulsatile stimulation of the cochlea.
    von Wallenberg EL; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():140-9. PubMed ID: 2356720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Lang-Roth R; Streicher B; Walger M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 24597635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of polyphony with cochlear implants for 2 and 3 simultaneous pitches.
    Penninger RT; Kludt E; Limb CJ; Leman M; Dhooge I; Buechner A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 24518404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.