These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668659)

  • 21. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multichannel auditory brain stem implant: case studies comparing fitting strategies and results.
    Otto S; Staller S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():36-9. PubMed ID: 7668706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Delayed perception of cochlear implant stimulation in children with postmeningitic ossified cochleae.
    Geier L; Gilden J; Luetje CM; Maddox HE
    Am J Otol; 1993 Nov; 14(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 8296858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of cochlear implant electrode deactivation on speech perception and in predicting device failure.
    Zeitler DM; Lalwani AK; Roland JT; Habib MG; Gudis D; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18833018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Facial nerve stimulation after successful multichannel cochlear implantation.
    Shea JJ; Domico EH
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 8572087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of glycerin, hyaluronic acid, and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose on the spiral ganglion of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Roland JT; Magardino TM; Go JT; Hillman DE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():64-8. PubMed ID: 7668760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Otosclerosis and facial nerve stimulation.
    Weber BP; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Hartrampf R; Dahm MC; Dietrich B
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():445-7. PubMed ID: 7668746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Facial nerve stimulation after cochlear implantation according to types of Nucleus 24-channel electrode arrays.
    Ahn JH; Oh SH; Chung JW; Lee KS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 129(6):588-91. PubMed ID: 18720074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG; Cao KL; Chen XW; Jin X; Zheng ZY; Zeng FG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children.
    Parisier SC; Chute PM; Popp AL; Suh GD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11192895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.