These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668661)

  • 1. Speech perception abilities of adults using a multichannel cochlear implant and frequency transposition hearing aid.
    Chute PM; Gravel JS; Popp AL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():260-3. PubMed ID: 7668661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception abilities of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, or hearing aids.
    Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Miyamoto RT; Berry SW; Myres WA; Kessler KS; Pope ML
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():105-15. PubMed ID: 2069171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aided versus implanted speech recognition abilities in severe to profound postlingual deafness.
    Kim HN; Chung MH; Shim YJ; Yoon JS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():153-4. PubMed ID: 7668612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of benefit from vibrotactile aid and cochlear implant for postlinguistically deaf adults.
    Skinner MW; Binzer SM; Fredrickson JM; Smith PG; Holden TA; Holden LK; Juelich MF; Turner BA
    Laryngoscope; 1988 Oct; 98(10):1092-9. PubMed ID: 3172956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception and production in children wearing a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Chmiel R; Clark J; Jerger J; Jenkins H; Freeman R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():314-6. PubMed ID: 7668686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception skills of children with multichannel cochlear implants or hearing aids.
    Miyamoto RT; Kirk KI; Todd SL; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():334-7. PubMed ID: 7668695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM; Beijk CM; Brokx JP; van den Borne S; van den Broek P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Perception of acoustic speech features with single channel cochlear implants and hearing aids. A comparative analysis].
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    HNO; 1988 Aug; 36(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 3170279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefit from bimodal hearing in a group of prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users.
    Berrettini S; Passetti S; Giannarelli M; Forli F
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 20015774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant.
    van Dijk JE; van Olphen AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():196-8. PubMed ID: 7668634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hearing aid management in young children with residual hearing and implications for use of cochlear implants].
    Arold R; Sesterhenn G; Tiesing S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jan; 71(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 1543524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Robbins AM; Myres WA; Kessler K; Pope ML
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Jan; 104(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 1900628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.