These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668661)

  • 21. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nucleus 20-channel and 21-channel auditory brain stem implants: first European experiences.
    Laszig R; Sollmann WP; Marangos N; Charachon R; Ramsden R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():28-30. PubMed ID: 7668669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Computer-assisted rehabilitation of auditory perception after cochlear implants and hearing aid management].
    Gross M; Herrmann HW
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):143-5. PubMed ID: 8172634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cochlear implant experience at the University of British Columbia.
    Doyle PJ; Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1987 Oct; 16(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 3682051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cochlear implants in deaf children who previously utilized hearing aids successfully or suffered deteriorating loss.
    Yaremko RL; Gibson WP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():217-9. PubMed ID: 7668643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Niewiarowicz M; Stieler O
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Lejeune B; Demanez L
    B-ENT; 2006; 2(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16910289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Extensive hearing loss and deafness in adults].
    Laszig R
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 8273025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech perception in children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony managed with either hearing AIDS or cochlear implants.
    Rance G; Barker EJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 18165792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Hamzavi J; Pok SM; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 15035557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing cochlear implant perceptual performance in 132 adults.
    Battmer RD; Gupta SP; Allum-Mecklenburg DJ; Lenarz T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():185-7. PubMed ID: 7668628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Our experience with cochlear implants: have we erred in our expectations?
    Berliner KI; Eisenberg LS
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 3631224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Blink reflex and auditory speech perception in prelingually cochlear-implanted children.
    Emamdjomeh H; Shafaghat L; Abbassalipour P; Hassanzadeh S; Alaeddini F; Farhadi M; Daneshi A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 15823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.