These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668661)

  • 61. Preoperative predictors of outcomes from cochlear implantation in adults: performance and quality of life.
    Summerfield AQ; Marshall DH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():105-8. PubMed ID: 7668594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Contribution with regard to the standardization of the terminology, the data and the rehabilitation program in cochlear implant research].
    Banfai P; Hortmann G; Karczag A; Kubik S; Lüers P
    HNO; 1982 Jul; 30(7):264-8. PubMed ID: 6896868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Timing and trials of hearing aids and assistive devices.
    Chute PM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):208-13. PubMed ID: 9334766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Speech perception by children with the Clarion (CIs) or nucleus 22 (SPEAK) cochlear implant or hearing aids.
    Meyer TA; Svirsky MA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():49-51. PubMed ID: 11141001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Preoperative hearing and evaluations for cochlear implant patients. A preliminary report using a Minimal Auditory Capabilities battery.
    Martin LF; Dowell RC; Clark GM
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 6225181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Optimizing cochlear implant speech performance.
    Skinner MW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2003 Sep; 191():4-13. PubMed ID: 14533838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Social performance ability in multichannel cochlear implantees.
    Kim HN; Shim YJ; Kim KM; Chang MS; Lee EH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():243-5. PubMed ID: 7668654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Cochlear implant and vibrotactile perception].
    Gersdorff M; Derne L; Sneppe R; Barbaix MT; Dutillieux D; de Wilde V; Vanderlinden F; Vanderbemden S
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1987; 108(4):335-7. PubMed ID: 3432782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Clinical results of a 15-filter digital auditory prosthesis using selective amplification and compression.
    Chouard CH; Genin J; Meyer B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 1604985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Establishing new criteria in selecting children for a cochlear implant: performance of "platinum" hearing aid users.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Sennaroglu G; Osberger MJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():30-3. PubMed ID: 11140994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Influence of preimplant experience with hearing aids on postimplant auditory perception.
    Kim SJ; Kim LS; Kang MK; Ahn YM
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1997; 52():299-301. PubMed ID: 9042511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cochlear implants.
    Douek E
    Baillieres Clin Neurol; 1995 Apr; 4(1):131-45. PubMed ID: 7633779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Hearing aid optimization in the evaluation of cochlear implant candidacy.
    Newall P; Oliver J
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():281-3. PubMed ID: 11892169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A brief perspective on cochlear implants.
    Balkany T
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Jan; 328(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 8418411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Implanted auditory prosthesis: an evaluation of subjects presently fitted with cochlear implants.
    Bilger RC; Black FO; Hopkinson NT; Myers EN
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(4 Pt 1):ORL-677-82. PubMed ID: 898520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Single-channel versus bilateral multichannel cochlear implant results: a case report.
    Pijl S
    Ear Hear; 1991 Dec; 12(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 1797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Vibrotactile devices as sensory aids for the deaf.
    Miyamoto RT; Myres WA; Wagner M; Punch JL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1987 Jul; 97(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 2956557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cochlear prosthesis: clinical results.
    Morel D; Charachon R; Génin J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():254-6. PubMed ID: 6596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The effect of a severely reduced dynamic range of hearing on the perception of speech.
    Villchur E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):131-40. PubMed ID: 292139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli.
    Blamey PJ; Parisi ES; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():220-2. PubMed ID: 7668645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.