These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668666)

  • 1. Preliminary findings of the new Spectra 22 speech processor with first-time cochlear implant users.
    George CR; Cafarelli Dees D; Sheridan C; Haacke N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():272-5. PubMed ID: 7668666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiologic results with the MSP/MPEAK and WSP/F0F1F2 processors and coding strategies for the nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 7996630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First results with the Spectra 22 Speech Processor at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Battmer RD
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():285-7. PubMed ID: 7668673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of Dutch phonemes by cochlear implant users with the Multipeak strategy.
    van Olphen AF; van Dijk JE; Langereis MC; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():365-8. PubMed ID: 7668709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The characteristics of hearing perception in light of the problem of rehabilitating patients who have undergone implantation].
    Lantsov AA; Petrov SM; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1998; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 9752087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech perception in children using the advanced Speak speech-processing strategy.
    Cowan RS; Brown C; Whitford LA; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Barker EJ; Shaw S; King A; Skok M; Seligman PM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():318-21. PubMed ID: 7668688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.
    Anderson I; Weichbold V; D'Haese P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2002 Apr; 81(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 11987740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.