These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668668)

  • 1. Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance.
    Hartrampf R; Dahm MC; Battmer RD; Gnadeberg D; Strauss-Schier A; Rost U; Lenarz T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():277-80. PubMed ID: 7668668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.
    Hochmair I; Arnold W; Nopp P; Jolly C; Müller J; Roland P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jun; 123(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 12875584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short electrode insertion in cochlear implantation: speech perception performance of Cantonese-speaking subjects.
    Chu KM; Au DK; Hui Y; Chow CK; Wei WI
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):718-24. PubMed ID: 16012033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Partial insertion of the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant: technique and results.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB
    Am J Otol; 1993 Jul; 14(4):357-61. PubMed ID: 8238271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive factors in cochlear implants.
    Albu S; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 9105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insertion length of electrode array and its relation to speech communication performance and nonauditory side effects in multichannel-implanted patients.
    Bredberg G; Lindström B
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():256-8. PubMed ID: 7668659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implants.
    Douek E
    Baillieres Clin Neurol; 1995 Apr; 4(1):131-45. PubMed ID: 7633779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Ketten DR; Skinner MW; Wang G; Vannier MW; Gates GA; Neely JG
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1998 Nov; 175():1-16. PubMed ID: 9826942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrodographic analysis and field evaluation of the Speak coding strategy.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Lai WK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():354-6. PubMed ID: 7668703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the multichannel intracochlear nucleus mini device in 24 postlingually deaf patients.
    Babighian G; Dominguez M; Amadori M; Pàntano N; Tomasi P; Babighian S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 8205981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants?
    Khan AM; Handzel O; Burgess BJ; Damian D; Eddington DK; Nadol JB
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Apr; 115(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 15805879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-up study of some speech communication results for multichannel-implanted patients.
    Lindström B; Bredberg G; Vainio M; Beidestam G; Rollvén B
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():287-90. PubMed ID: 7668674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception.
    Hamzavi J; Arnoldner C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(11):1182-7. PubMed ID: 17050311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.