These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668671)

  • 1. Auditory perception in three postlingually deaf patients with the Nucleus Mini System-22 cochlear implant.
    Hassanzadeh S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():282-3. PubMed ID: 7668671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():294-8. PubMed ID: 7668677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants.
    Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of prelingually and perilingually deafened children and adults with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    García JM; Barón de Otero C; García J; Peñaranda A; Niño C; Campos S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8205978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Speech perception in children fitted with Nucleus mini system 22 implants].
    Seeger T; Reid J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1993; 114(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 8059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen P; Snik A; van den Broek P
    Audiology; 1997; 36(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 9099406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance changes in University College Hospital/Royal National Institute for the Deaf single-channel cochlear implant users upgraded to the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system.
    Eyles JA; Aleksy WL; Boyle PJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():263-5. PubMed ID: 7668662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Open-set speech perception in congenitally deaf children using cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Gomolin RH; Green JE; Shapiro WH; Hoffman RA; Roland JT
    Am J Otol; 1997 May; 18(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 9149829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [History of the development and functional description of the Nucleus cochlear implant].
    Maltan AA
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1994; 144(1-2):29-33. PubMed ID: 8197760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experience with the multichannel intracochlear nucleus mini device in 24 postlingually deaf patients.
    Babighian G; Dominguez M; Amadori M; Pàntano N; Tomasi P; Babighian S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 8205981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception by prelingually deaf children and postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implant.
    Tyler R; Parkinson AJ; Fryauf-Bertchy H; Lowder MW; Parkinson WS; Gantz BJ; Kelsay DM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 46():65-71. PubMed ID: 9309840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory capabilities of patients implanted with the House single-channel cochlear implant.
    Brimacombe JA; Edgerton BJ; Doyle KJ; Erratt JD; Danhauer JL
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():204-16. PubMed ID: 6596844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant in postlingually deaf adults.
    Gantz BJ; Tyler RS; Woodworth G
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():268-9. PubMed ID: 7668664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.