These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668676)

  • 1. Continuing improvements in speech processing for adult cochlear implant patients.
    Hollow RD; Dowell RC; Cowan RS; Skok MC; Pyman BC; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():292-4. PubMed ID: 7668676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
    Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Results with the currently used cochlear implant.
    Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech-perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Uziel AS; Reuillard-Artieres F; Sillon M; Vieu A; Mondain M; Piron JP; Tobey EA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 8841701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rehabilitation and assessment of aural-oral speech development in children with cochlear implants].
    Lantsov AA; Koroleva IV; Pudov VI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2000; (3):6-12. PubMed ID: 10846480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary findings of the new Spectra 22 speech processor with first-time cochlear implant users.
    George CR; Cafarelli Dees D; Sheridan C; Haacke N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():272-5. PubMed ID: 7668666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patients.
    Müller-Deile J; Schmidt BJ; Rudert H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():303-6. PubMed ID: 7668681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception and production in children wearing a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Chmiel R; Clark J; Jerger J; Jenkins H; Freeman R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():314-6. PubMed ID: 7668686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and a tactile device.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():339-41. PubMed ID: 7668697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Speech discrimination in post-lingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Lautischer M; Baumgartner WD
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):487-91. PubMed ID: 10890126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Considerations on the rehabilitation of the hearing in cochlear implant patients].
    Amadori M; Pantano N; Cestaro A; Babighian G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1996 Aug; 16(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9082826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of Dutch phonemes by cochlear implant users with the Multipeak strategy.
    van Olphen AF; van Dijk JE; Langereis MC; Smoorenburg GF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():365-8. PubMed ID: 7668709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages and disadvantages expected and realized by pediatric cochlear implant recipients as reported by their parents.
    Kelsay DM; Tyler RS
    Am J Otol; 1996 Nov; 17(6):866-73. PubMed ID: 8915415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.