These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668691)

  • 1. Longitudinal comparison of the benefits of cochlear implants and tactile aids in a controlled educational setting.
    Geers AE; Tobey EA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():328-9. PubMed ID: 7668691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids.
    Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception and production in children wearing a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
    Chmiel R; Clark J; Jerger J; Jenkins H; Freeman R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():314-6. PubMed ID: 7668686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and a tactile device.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():339-41. PubMed ID: 7668697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intelligibility of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
    Miyamoto RT; Svirsky M; Kirk KI; Robbins AM; Todd S; Riley A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1997 May; 168():35-6. PubMed ID: 9153115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM; Beijk CM; Brokx JP; van den Borne S; van den Broek P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech discrimination and intelligibility: outcome of deaf children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Lejeune B; Demanez L
    B-ENT; 2006; 2(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 16910289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting long-term benefits from single-channel cochlear implants in profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Geers AE; Moog JS
    Am J Otol; 1988 Mar; 9(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 3407753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educational aspects of cochlear implants in children.
    Maddox HE; Stout GG; Jorgensen S
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 3754950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implants in deaf children who previously utilized hearing aids successfully or suffered deteriorating loss.
    Yaremko RL; Gibson WP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():217-9. PubMed ID: 7668643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing.
    Chin SB; Tsai PL; Gao S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2003 Nov; 12(4):440-51. PubMed ID: 14658996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech communication for the deaf: visual, tactile, and cochlear-implant.
    Pickett JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 2420984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal improvements in communication and socialization of deaf children with cochlear implants and hearing aids: evidence from parental reports.
    Bat-Chava Y; Martin D; Kosciw JG
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 46(12):1287-96. PubMed ID: 16313429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intelligibility of implanted children.
    Robbins AM; Kirk KI; Osberger MJ; Ertmer D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():399-401. PubMed ID: 7668721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The child with hearing deficiency. Medical, educational, sociological and psychological aspects].
    Périer O; De Temmerman P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(3):342-57. PubMed ID: 2975135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of speech perception in children with cochlear implants and tactile aids: what should the future hold?
    Carney AE
    Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():201-4. PubMed ID: 2069182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of benefit from UCH/RNID single-channel extracochlear implant and tactile acoustic monitor.
    Aleksy W
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 18():55-7. PubMed ID: 2607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 15148189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implants in young children.
    Niparko JK; Blankenhorn R
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 14648819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.