These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Perception of sentences, words, and speech features by profoundly hearing-impaired children using a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1374-84. PubMed ID: 2146297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor in a cochlear implant program for profoundly hearing-impaired adults. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Galvin KL; Alcantara JI; Whitford LA; Clark GM Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2026287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits for congenitally deaf adolescents with an electrotactile speech processor and a cochlear implant. Sarant J; Cowan R; Blamey P; Galvin K; Clark G J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Apr; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 8652870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating tactile aids for speech perception and production by hearing-impaired adults and children. Weisenberger JM; Kozma-Spytek L Am J Otol; 1991; 12 Suppl():188-200. PubMed ID: 2069181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a multichannel electrotactile speech processor by profoundly hearing-impaired children in a total communication environment. Galvin KL; Cowan RS; Sarant JZ; Alcántara JI; Blamey PJ; Clark GM J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Oct; 2(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 1837739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing. Cowan RS; DelDot J; Barker EJ; Sarant JZ; Pegg P; Dettman S; Galvin KL; Rance G; Hollow R; Dowell RC; Pyman B; Gibson WP; Clark GM Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S125-6. PubMed ID: 9391629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech self-monitoring by children using an electrotactile speech processor. Galvin KL; Cowan RS; Sarant JZ; Tobey EA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():456-8. PubMed ID: 7668751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech feature recognition by profoundly hearing impaired children using a multiple-channel electrotactile speech processor and aided residual hearing. Alcántara JI; Whitford LA; Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Clark GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1260-73. PubMed ID: 2146295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Longitudinal speech perception performance of young children with cochlear implants and tactile aids plus hearing aids. Eilers RE; Cobo-Lewis AB; Vergara KC; Oller DK Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():50-4. PubMed ID: 9428045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Articulation accuracy of children using an electrotactile speech processor. Galvin KL; Cowan RS; Sarant JZ; Tobey EA; Blamey PJ; Clark GM Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 7789672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment techniques to evaluate tactual aids for hearing-impaired subjects. Eilers RE; Widen JE; Oller DK J Rehabil Res Dev; 1988; 25(2):33-46. PubMed ID: 3361459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phonemic information transmitted by a multichannel electrotactile speech processor. Blamey PJ; Cowan RS; Alcantara JI; Clark GM J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):620-9. PubMed ID: 3230892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value. Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]