These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7668768)

  • 1. Using impedance telemetry to diagnose cochlear electrode history, location, and functionality.
    Schulman JH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():85-7. PubMed ID: 7668768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Back-telemetry and the Clarion cochlear prosthesis.
    Zilberman Y; Santogrossi T
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():146-7. PubMed ID: 7668609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance measurement of the Nucleus 22-electrode array in patients.
    Swanson B; Seligman P; Carter P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():141-4. PubMed ID: 7668607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
    Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electron microscopy changes of cochlear implant electrodes with permanently high impedances.
    Durisin M; Krause C; Arnoldner C; Kontorinis G; Buechner A; Lenarz T; Lesinki-Schiedat A; Profant O; Neuburger J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Nov; 12(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 22251811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Monitoring of implant electrode impedance].
    Petrov SM; Shchukina AA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2011; (2):30-2. PubMed ID: 21512482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Importance of a Preinsertion Integrity Device Test of Cochlear Implants.
    Körtje M; Stöver T; Leinung M; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):e641-e644. PubMed ID: 35709419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Richardson R; Huang CQ; Milojevic D; Cowan R; Shepherd R
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15876642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
    Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
    Duan YY; Clark GM; Cowan RS
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
    Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
    Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "pull-back" technique for Nucleus 24 perimodiolar electrode insertion.
    Todt I; Basta D; Eisenschenk A; Ernst A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 May; 132(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 15886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear reimplantations: technical and surgical failures.
    Sorrentino T; Coté M; Eter E; Laborde ML; Cochard N; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19031298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrical properties of retinal-electrode interface.
    Shah S; Hines A; Zhou D; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S24-9. PubMed ID: 17325413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Reeder RM; Raulie JC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.