These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7670010)

  • 21. [Effects of high-strip density anti-scatter grid on image quality and radiation dose].
    Wamser G; Maier W; Aichinger H; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 Jun; 166(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 9272997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
    Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
    Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts.
    Busch HP
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):8-10. PubMed ID: 7734546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
    Galanski M; Prokop M; Thorns E; Oestmann JW; Reichelt S; Haubitz B; Milbradt H; Gräser A; Verner L; Schaefer C
    Rofo; 1992 Jan; 156(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 1733477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two film-screen systems for chest radiography.
    Lefcoe MS; Cunningham IA; Vanderburgh LC; Sparrow RK
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 8640420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].
    Müller RD; John V; Voss M; Buddenbrock B; Blendl C; Hirche H; Ewen K; Löhr E
    Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 8334259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP; Winter-Nossek A; Bethke U; Kohler P; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of a new dual characteristic film-screen system (insight) with a standard film-screen system for chest radiology.
    Logan PM; Tunney T; McCoy CT; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):162-5. PubMed ID: 8130978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.