These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7670277)

  • 21. Semen and cervical mucus parameters and success in artificial insemination.
    Boyers AI; Shenfield F; Valentine A
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Sep; 6(8):1108-14. PubMed ID: 1806571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
    Westergaard LG
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients' husbands: a systematic review of the literature.
    Osuna C; Matorras R; Pijoan JI; Rodríguez-Escudero FJ
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15236980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: a decade of experience.
    Kovacs G; Baker G; Burger H; De Kretser D; Lording D; Lee J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Apr; 95(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 3382608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Strategies in frozen donor semen procreation.
    Le Lannou D; Gastard E; Guivarch A; Laurent MC; Poulain P
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1765-74. PubMed ID: 8582977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Single versus double insemination: a retrospective audit of pregnancy rates with two treatment protocols in donor insemination.
    Deary AJ; Seaton JE; Prentice A; Morton NC; Booth AK; Smith SK
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Jul; 12(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 9262284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intrauterine insemination. Effect of wash media on pregnancy rates and sperm motility.
    Rhoton AS; Williams RS; Dattilo M; Konicek J; Fossum GT
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Sep; 38(9):711-5. PubMed ID: 8254594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
    Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Therapeutic inseminations of cryopreserved donor sperm in 1,483 menstrual cycles (computer-assisted documentation). II. Effect of the donor on the outcome of insemination].
    Glander HJ; Kunert M; Forberg J
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(11):656-62. PubMed ID: 3436475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relationship between donor sperm parameters and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 2821 cycles in 1355 couples.
    Guan HT; Zheng Y; Wang JJ; Meng TQ; Xia W; Hu SH; Xiong CL; Rao M
    Andrologia; 2016 Feb; 48(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 25703867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Strategies to improve the fertility of fresh and frozen donkey semen.
    de Oliveira JV; Oliveira PV; Melo e Oña CM; Guasti PN; Monteiro GA; Sancler da Silva YF; Papa Pde M; Alvarenga MA; Dell'Aqua Junior JA; Papa FO
    Theriogenology; 2016 Apr; 85(7):1267-73. PubMed ID: 26806444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [1992 results of sperm donor procreation. French Federation of CECOS and private cooperative centers].
    Alnot MO
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1993 May; 21(5):371-3. PubMed ID: 7920919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Efficacy of a program of insemination with cryopreserved semen as treatment of the male factor].
    Aranda Gallegos JE; Alvarez Robles L; Barrón Vallejo J; Kably Ambe A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Dec; 65():520-2. PubMed ID: 9477647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The more accurate timing of insemination with regard to ovulation does not create a significant improvement in pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program.
    Brook PF; Barratt CL; Cooke ID
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Feb; 61(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 8299788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical and neonatal outcomes of intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm.
    Chen L; Zhu L; Cai C; Yan G; Sun H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2018 Aug; 64(4):240-245. PubMed ID: 29600727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abnormal findings on hysterosalpingography: effects on fecundity in a donor insemination program using frozen semen.
    Stovall DW; Christman GM; Hammond MG; Talbert LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 1635739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methods to increase the success rate of artificial insemination with donor semen.
    Depypere HT; Gordts S; Campo R; Comhaire F
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Apr; 9(4):661-3. PubMed ID: 8046019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factors affecting the success of artificial insemination by frozen donor semen.
    Wong AW; Ho PC; Kwan M; Ma HK
    Int J Fertil; 1989; 34(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2565300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Influence of artificial insemination with donor sperm on the pregnancy outcomes and safety of the offspring].
    Liu Y; Liu XY; Wang BS; Wang BS; Xu CS; Li H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Mar; 22(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 27172662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Therapeutic inseminations of cryopreserved donor sperm in 1,483 menstrual cycles (computer-assisted documentation). I. Follow-up status and results of insemination treatment].
    Glander HJ; Kunert M; Forberg J
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(11):647-55. PubMed ID: 3436474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.