These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7670277)

  • 41. Randomized controlled trial of cervical cap with intracervical reservoir versus standard intracervical injection to inseminate cryopreserved donor semen.
    Coulson C; McLaughlin EA; Harris S; Ford WC; Hull MG
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Jan; 11(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 8671164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [1995 evaluation of medically-assisted procreation with a donor. French Federation of CECOS].
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1996 Sep; 24(9):684-7. PubMed ID: 8998518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters and their evolution during preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed donor semen cycles.
    Fréour T; Jean M; Mirallié S; Dubourdieu S; Barrière P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Apr; 149(2):186-9. PubMed ID: 20074847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Therapeutic donor insemination with frozen semen.
    Scott SG; Mortimer D; Taylor PJ; Leader A; Pattinson HA
    CMAJ; 1990 Aug; 143(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 2383847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion used in a donor insemination programme.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jul; 7(6):806-12. PubMed ID: 1500479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Therapeutic donor insemination: a prospective randomized trial of fresh versus frozen sperm.
    Subak LL; Adamson GD; Boltz NL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1597-604; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 1615966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Artificial insemination with frozen semen in dogs: a retrospective study of 10 years using a non-surgical approach.
    Thomassen R; Sanson G; Krogenaes A; Fougner JA; Berg KA; Farstad W
    Theriogenology; 2006 Oct; 66(6-7):1645-50. PubMed ID: 16469370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultrasound in the timing of artificial insemination with frozen donor semen.
    Saaranen M; Suhonen M; Saarikoski S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 3536682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Intrauterine insemination with donor semen. Treatment of involuntary childlessness caused by male infertility].
    Vilsbøll T; Helmsøe-Zinck L; Andersen AN
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1994 Aug; 156(34):4826-9. PubMed ID: 7992417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Factors affecting the success of donor insemination.
    Aiman J
    Fertil Steril; 1982 Jan; 37(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 7060763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cumulative delivery rates in different age groups after artificial insemination with donor sperm.
    De Brucker M; Haentjens P; Evenepoel J; Devroey P; Collins J; Tournaye H
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1891-9. PubMed ID: 19369295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Artificial procreation with frozen donor semen: experience of the French Federation CECOS.
    Le Lannou D; Lansac J
    Hum Reprod; 1989 Oct; 4(7):757-61. PubMed ID: 2691525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of halving the standard dose of cryopreserved semen for donor insemination: a controlled study of conception rates.
    Corrigan E; McLaughlin EA; Coulson C; Ford WC; Hull MG
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Feb; 9(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 8027291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Therapeutic donor insemination: fresh versus frozen.
    Barlet EM; Penney LL
    Mo Med; 1994 Feb; 91(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 8183223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa.
    Botchan A; Hauser R; Gamzu R; Yogev L; Paz G; Yavetz H
    Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2298-304. PubMed ID: 11679508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
    Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm. Pregnancy outcome in relation to age and ovarian stimulation regime.
    Ferrara I; Balet R; Grudzinskas JG
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Sep; 17(9):2320-4. PubMed ID: 12202419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Success of intrauterine insemination using cryopreserved donor sperm is related to the age of the woman and the number of preovulatory follicles.
    Pittrof RU; Shaker A; Dean N; Bekir JS; Campbell S; Tan SL
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Apr; 13(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 8777345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of factors related to the recipient and insemination characteristics on the success of artificial insemination with frozen semen.
    Mahadevan MM; Trounson AO; Milne BJ; Leeton JF
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Sep; 1(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 7187266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pregnancy rates in a donor sperm program using cryopreservation: effects of total number of motile sperm inseminated and of a procedure to concentrate sperm.
    Maier DB; Kuslis SS; Luciano AA
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1994; 39(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 7920750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.