BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7670605)

  • 1. An in vivo evaluation of adhesives used in extraoral maxillofacial prostheses.
    Haug SP; Richard GE; Margiotti E; Winkler MM; Moore DJ
    J Prosthodont; 1995 Mar; 4(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 7670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of tissue adhesives used for retaining extraoral silicone prostheses in maxillofacial defects: A systematic review.
    J L J; V M; Rangasamy J; Ramanarayanan V; Nair PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38653691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo.
    Kiat-Amnuay S; Gettleman L; Goldsmith LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 15343167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adhesive retention of silicone and chlorinated polyethylene for maxillofacial prostheses.
    Kiat-Amnuay S; Waters PJ; Roberts D; Gettleman L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 18514671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical behavior of three maxillofacial prosthetic adhesive systems: a pilot project.
    Wolfaardt JF; Tam V; Faulkner MG; Prasad N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):943-9. PubMed ID: 1494125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of adhesive retention of maxillofacial prostheses. Part 2: Time and reapplication effects.
    Kiat-Amnuay S; Gettleman L; Khan Z; Goldsmith LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 11357068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of primers and surface bonding characteristics on the adhesion of polyurethane to two commonly used silicone elastomers.
    Chang PP; Hansen NA; Phoenix RD; Schneid TR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19166545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate.
    Hatamleh MM; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 20122716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strength of double-sided adhesive tapes used for facial prostheses.
    Polyzois GL
    Spec Care Dentist; 1994; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 8042138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: skin dressings and solvent removers.
    Kiat-amnuay S; Gettleman L; Khan Z; Goldsmith LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 11005907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tensile bond strength of maxillofacial adhesives.
    Polyzois GL; Oilo G; Dahl JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 8463965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of differences and reapplication effect of peel bond strength between silicone-based and water-based adhesives.
    Rajasekaran R; Chander NG; Reddy JR; Balasubramanium M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1276-1279. PubMed ID: 35764450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biocompatibility of primers and an adhesive used for implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses: An in vitro analysis.
    Bonatto LDR; Goiato MC; da Silva EVF; Oliveira SHP; Haddad MF; Chaves Neto AH; Brito VGB; Dos Santos DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 27836141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of a modified cross-linked silicone for maxillofacial prostheses.
    Farah JW; Robinson JC; Koran A; Craig RG; Hood JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Nov; 14(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 3481399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a photoprotective agent to increase the color stability of a tinted extraoral prosthetic silicone.
    Bryant AW; Schaaf NG; Casey DM
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Jun; 3(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 9227104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesive retention of experimental fiber-reinforced composite, orthodontic acrylic resin, and aliphatic urethane acrylate to silicone elastomer for maxillofacial prostheses.
    Kosor BY; Artunç C; Şahan H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 25858221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential of cohesive silicone for facial prosthetic use: a material property study and a clinical report.
    Koyama S; Sasaki K; Hanawa S; Sato N
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 21518076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New organosilicon maxillofacial prosthetic materials.
    Lai JH; Wang LL; Ko CC; DeLong RL; Hodges JS
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 11823022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.
    Montgomery PC; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):482-90. PubMed ID: 20002975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials.
    Lai JH; Hodges JS
    Dent Mater; 1999 Nov; 15(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 10863448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.