These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7670865)

  • 1. Predicting mutagenicity of chemicals using topological and quantum chemical parameters: a similarity based study.
    Basak SC; Grunwald GD
    Chemosphere; 1995 Jul; 31(1):2529-46. PubMed ID: 7670865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantum-chemical studies on mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines.
    Borosky GL
    Front Biosci (Schol Ed); 2013 Jan; 5(2):600-10. PubMed ID: 23277072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutagenicity of aromatic amines and amides with chemical models for cytochrome P450 in Ames assay.
    Inami K; Okazawa M; Mochizuki M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Sep; 23(6):986-91. PubMed ID: 19563884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of aromatic amines mutagenicity from theoretical molecular descriptors.
    Gramatica P; Consonni V; Pavan M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):237-50. PubMed ID: 14506868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: A case study using aromatic amine mutagenicity.
    Ahlberg E; Amberg A; Beilke LD; Bower D; Cross KP; Custer L; Ford KA; Van Gompel J; Harvey J; Honma M; Jolly R; Joossens E; Kemper RA; Kenyon M; Kruhlak N; Kuhnke L; Leavitt P; Naven R; Neilan C; Quigley DP; Shuey D; Spirkl HP; Stavitskaya L; Teasdale A; White A; Wichard J; Zwickl C; Myatt GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():1-12. PubMed ID: 26879463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A knowledge-based expert rule system for predicting mutagenicity (Ames test) of aromatic amines and azo compounds.
    Gadaleta D; Manganelli S; Manganaro A; Porta N; Benfenati E
    Toxicology; 2016 Aug; 370():20-30. PubMed ID: 27644887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanistic Reactivity Descriptors for the Prediction of Ames Mutagenicity of Primary Aromatic Amines.
    Kuhnke L; Ter Laak A; Göller AH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):668-672. PubMed ID: 30694664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computational identification of structural factors affecting the mutagenic potential of aromatic amines: study design and experimental validation.
    Slavov SH; Stoyanova-Slavova I; Mattes W; Beger RD; Brüschweiler BJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2018 Jul; 92(7):2369-2384. PubMed ID: 29779177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of QSARs and characterization of structural basis of bioactivity using partial order theory and formal concept analysis: a case study with mutagenicity.
    Restrepo G; Basak SC; Mills D
    Curr Comput Aided Drug Des; 2011 Jun; 7(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 21542792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines from structure: a hierarchical QSAR approach.
    Basak SC; Mills DR; Balaban AT; Gute BD
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2001; 41(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 11410045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diaminonaphthalenes and related aminocompounds: mutagenicity, CYP1A induction and interaction with the Ah receptor.
    Cheung YL; Lewis DF; Ridd TI; Gray TJ; Ioannides C
    Toxicology; 1997 Mar; 118(2-3):115-27. PubMed ID: 9129166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment.
    Benigni R; Passerini L
    Mutat Res; 2002 Jul; 511(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 12088717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of the genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices.
    Cash GG
    Mutat Res; 2001 Apr; 491(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 11287295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for estimating the mutagenicity of chemicals. Part 1. Aromatic amines.
    Devillers J; Mombelli E
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):753-69. PubMed ID: 21120760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computing similarity between structural environments of mutagenicity alerts.
    Chakravarti SK; Saiakhov RD
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 30346583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
    Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerance space and molecular similarity.
    Basak SC; Grunwald GD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(4):265-77. PubMed ID: 8605633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of graph theoretic parameters in risk assessment of chemicals.
    Basak SC; Bertelsen S; Grunwald GD
    Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):239-50. PubMed ID: 7570662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The importance of the hydrophobic interaction in the mutagenicity of organic compounds.
    Debnath AK; Shusterman AJ; Lopez de Compadre RL; Hansch C
    Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 7508548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative correlation of mutagenic and carcinogenic potencies for heterocyclic amines from cooked foods and additional aromatic amines.
    Hatch FT; Knize MG; Moore DH; Felton JS
    Mutat Res; 1992 Jun; 271(3):269-87. PubMed ID: 1378200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.