These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7671650)

  • 1. The priority of separable perception in stimulus classifications of children with mental retardation.
    Cook G; Stephens JT
    Child Dev; 1995 Aug; 66(4):1057-71. PubMed ID: 7671650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separable and integral responding by children and adults to the dimensions of length and density.
    Ward TB
    Child Dev; 1980 Sep; 51(3):676-84. PubMed ID: 7418505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a test battery (NPM-X) for neuropsychological and neuromotor examination of children with developmental disabilities or mental retardation. A theoretical and clinical study.
    Gjaerum B
    Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1997; 390():1-55. PubMed ID: 9212855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feeling the parts: a developmental study of separable perception with tactile dimensions.
    Cook G; Sprague R
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Apr; 122(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 7790847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 May; 65(2):141-70. PubMed ID: 9169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of perceived stimulus structure and intelligence: further tests of a separability hypothesis.
    Burns B
    Am J Ment Defic; 1986 Sep; 91(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 3766620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation utilizing conditional-discrimination tasks and multiple testing procedures.
    Huguenin NH
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(2):155-81. PubMed ID: 15026092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonemic support in comprehension: comparisons between children with and without mild mental retardation.
    Kabrich M; McCutchen D
    Am J Ment Retard; 1996 Mar; 100(5):510-27. PubMed ID: 8852302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Classification in young and retarded children: the primacy of overall similarity relations.
    Kemler DG
    Child Dev; 1982 Jun; 53(3):768-79. PubMed ID: 7094679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjectively interpreted shape dimensions as privileged and orthogonal axes in mental shape space.
    Ons B; De Baene W; Wagemans J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):422-41. PubMed ID: 20853999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mental rotation of unfamiliar stimuli by teenagers with mental retardation: role of feature salience.
    Courbois Y; Oross S; Clerc J
    Am J Ment Retard; 2007 Sep; 112(5):311-8. PubMed ID: 17676956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noticing of unexpected events by adults with and without mental retardation.
    Stoffregen TA; Baldwin CA; Flynn SB
    Am J Ment Retard; 1993 Sep; 98(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 8398086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual sensitivity to dimensional and similarity relations in free and rule-governed classifications.
    Cook GL; Odom RD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1988 Apr; 45(2):319-38. PubMed ID: 3361271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental trends in haptic and visual free classifications: influence of stimulus structure and exploration on decisional processes.
    Berger C; Hatwell Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Dec; 63(3):447-65. PubMed ID: 8953223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual learning and free classification.
    Wills AJ; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 Aug; 51(3):235-70. PubMed ID: 9745383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification by retarded and nonretarded children of stimuli varying along one, two, or three dimensions.
    Smith J; Kaufman H; Dutch S; Frost R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Sep; 80(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 1163565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence from two genetic syndromes for the independence of spatial and visual working memory.
    Vicari S; Bellucci S; Carlesimo GA
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2006 Feb; 48(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16417668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention to perceptual dimensions and switching between dimensions.
    Meiran N; Dimov E; Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 22409145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do chickens (Gallus gallus f. domestica) decompose visual figures?
    Werner CW; Tiemann I; Cnotka J; Rehkämper G
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 15490291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Violation of pure insertion during mental rotation is independent of stimulus type, task, and subjects' age.
    Jansen-Osmann P; Heil M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):280-7. PubMed ID: 16438923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.