These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 767175)
1. The conservative restoration of class IV and VI defects. Going RE Dent Clin North Am; 1976 Apr; 20(2):365-84. PubMed ID: 767175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A technique for restoring Class V caries in primary canines. Margolis FS Gen Dent; 2008 May; 56(3):278-80. PubMed ID: 19288837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptation of composite resin restorative materials to retentive grooves of Class I cavity preparations. Allanigue CM; Rapp R; Piesco NP; Elliott MA; Nirschl RF; Guevara PA; Zullo TG Pediatr Dent; 1986 Jun; 8(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 3526296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries. Smales RJ; Yip HK Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond. Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding. Summitt JB; Chan DC; Dutton FB Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictability and aesthetics with nonmetal onlays. Ruiz JL; Nelson C; Bazan R Dent Today; 2007 Apr; 26(4):106, 108, 110. PubMed ID: 17486785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part I. Proper cavity preparation and placement techniques. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 8432947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Indications for the use of amalgam and the importance of cavity preparation]. Riethe P Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 6931805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations. Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The extensive amalgam restoration and retention possibilities]. Plasmans PJ; Vermeulen AH; de Jonge BA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Nov; 92(11):439-43. PubMed ID: 3868739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of cavity liners in adhesive fillings]. Schwickerath H; Nolden R Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1982 Apr; 37(4):336-8. PubMed ID: 7047142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Restorative dentistry: use of metallic pins as retention aids. I. Types of pins, retention factors and placement techniques]. Pacces JG; Simonetti EL Ars Curandi Odontol; 1978 Nov; 5(8):43-51. PubMed ID: 286589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in class V and IV restorations. Duke ES; Robbins JW; Trevino D Compendium; 1994 Jul; 15(7):852, 854, 856 passim; quiz 864. PubMed ID: 7728815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]