These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 767247)

  • 1. A review of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in auto safety.
    Goodenough DR
    Hum Factors; 1976 Feb; 18(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 767247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement.
    Mihal WL; Barrett GV
    J Appl Psychol; 1976 Apr; 61(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 1262300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive abilities and safety on the road: a re-examination of individual differences in dichotic listening and search for embedded figures.
    McKenna FP; Duncan J; Brown ID
    Ergonomics; 1986 May; 29(5):649-63. PubMed ID: 3720722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Preliminary research for the validation of a battery of tests for auto drivers, carried out among a group of driving school pupils, based on the criterion of teacher's judgement].
    TRAINA F
    Rass Med Ind Ig Lav; 1960; 29():455-69. PubMed ID: 13777829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences and the perception of traffic signs.
    Loo R
    Hum Factors; 1978 Feb; 20(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 640695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field dependence and driver visual search behavior.
    Shinar D; McDowell ED; Rackoff NJ; Rockwell TH
    Hum Factors; 1978 Oct; 20(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 721096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motion sickness, field dependence, and levels of development.
    Deich RF; Hodges PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1115-20. PubMed ID: 4711961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the study of personality factors in research on driving behavior.
    Signori EI; Bowman RG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):1067-76. PubMed ID: 4420763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory.
    Goodenough DR
    Psychol Bull; 1976 Jul; 83(4):675-94. PubMed ID: 785518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motorcycle accidents, rider behaviour, and psychological models.
    Özkan T; Lajunen T; Doğruyol B; Yıldırım Z; Çoymak A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov; 49():124-32. PubMed ID: 23036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in driver inattention: the attention-related driving errors scale.
    Ledesma RD; Montes SA; Poó FM; López-Ramón MF
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Apr; 11(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 20373233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between perceptual style and reactivity to motion.
    Long GM; Ambler RK; Guedry FE
    J Appl Psychol; 1975 Oct; 60(5):599-605. PubMed ID: 1080759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of driving experience on responses to a static hazard perception test.
    Scialfa CT; Borkenhagen D; Lyon J; Deschênes M; Horswill M; Wetton M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():547-53. PubMed ID: 22269541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of static and dynamic hazard perception tests.
    Scialfa CT; Borkenhagen D; Lyon J; Deschênes M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():268-73. PubMed ID: 23287114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferred time headway in car-following and individual differences in perceptual-motor skills.
    van Winsum W
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):863-73. PubMed ID: 9885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between ocular dominance and field-dependence/independence.
    Ruggieri V; Bergerone C; Cei A; Ceridono D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Dec; 51(3 Pt 2):1247-51. PubMed ID: 7220227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Susceptibility to motion sickness and field dependence-independence as measured with the rod and frame test.
    Mirabile CS; Glueck BC; Stroebel CF
    Neuropsychobiology; 1976; 2(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 1004699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term study of simulator sickness: differences in EEG response due to individual sensitivity.
    Park JR; Lim DW; Lee SY; Lee HW; Choi MH; Chung SC
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 118(6):857-65. PubMed ID: 18465429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of perceptual treatments on driver's behavior: from driving simulator studies to field tests--first results.
    Auberlet JM; Rosey F; Anceaux F; Aubin S; Briand P; Pacaux MP; Plainchault P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():91-8. PubMed ID: 22269489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A hazard perception test for novice drivers.
    Scialfa CT; Deschênes MC; Ference J; Boone J; Horswill MS; Wetton M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jan; 43(1):204-8. PubMed ID: 21094314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.