462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673290)
1. The influence of surface-blasting on the incorporation of titanium-alloy implants in a rabbit intramedullary model.
Feighan JE; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Parr JA; Stevenson S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Sep; 77(9):1380-95. PubMed ID: 7673290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.
Goldberg VM; Stevenson S; Feighan J; Davy D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):122-9. PubMed ID: 7554621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of surface-blasted implants made of titanium alloy and cobalt-chromium alloy in a rabbit intramedullary model.
Jinno T; Goldberg VM; Davy D; Stevenson S
J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Oct; 42(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 9740003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants.
Dalton JE; Cook SD; Thomas KA; Kay JF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 7822360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits.
Salou L; Hoornaert A; Louarn G; Layrolle P
Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():494-502. PubMed ID: 25449926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of biomaterial surface texture on bone ingrowth in the rabbit femur.
Friedman RJ; An YH; Ming J; Draughn RA; Bauer TW
J Orthop Res; 1996 May; 14(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 8676259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioceramic inlays do not improve mechanical incorporation of grit-blasted titanium stems in the proximal sheep femur.
Keränen P; Koort J; Itälä A; Ylänen H; Dalstra M; Hupa M; Kommonen B; Aro HT
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1578-86. PubMed ID: 19437438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osteointegrative and microgeometric comparison between micro-blasted and alumina blasting/acid etching on grade II and V titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V).
Granato R; Bonfante EA; Castellano A; Khan R; Jimbo R; Marin C; Morsi S; Witek L; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 97():288-295. PubMed ID: 31146202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.
Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z
Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel hydrophilic nanostructured microtexture on direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V surfaces enhances osteoblast response in vitro and osseointegration in a rabbit model.
Hyzy SL; Cheng A; Cohen DJ; Yatzkaier G; Whitehead AJ; Clohessy RM; Gittens RA; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Aug; 104(8):2086-98. PubMed ID: 27086616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphate coating on the implant/bone response.
Hayakawa T; Yoshinari M; Nemoto K; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Aug; 11(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11168222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants.
Götz HE; Müller M; Emmel A; Holzwarth U; Erben RG; Stangl R
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4057-64. PubMed ID: 15046896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone response to implant surface morphology.
D'Lima DD; Lemperle SM; Chen PC; Holmes RE; Colwell CW
J Arthroplasty; 1998 Dec; 13(8):928-34. PubMed ID: 9880187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants.
Stangl R; Pries A; Loos B; Müller M; Erben RG
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):444-53. PubMed ID: 15127391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cytocompatibility and osseointegration of the Ti implants with XPEED® surfaces.
Lee SY; Yang DJ; Yeo S; An HW; Ryoo KH; Park KB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22093072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V implants with bone-inspired porosity and micro/nanoscale surface roughness in the rabbit femur.
Cohen DJ; Cheng A; Sahingur K; Clohessy RM; Hopkins LB; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
Biomed Mater; 2017 Apr; 12(2):025021. PubMed ID: 28452335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative contributions of chemistry and topography to the osseointegration of hydroxyapatite coatings.
Hacking SA; Tanzer M; Harvey EJ; Krygier JJ; Bobyn JD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Dec; (405):24-38. PubMed ID: 12461353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The osseous response to corundum blasted implant surfaces in a canine hip model.
Hacking SA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M; Krygier JJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):240-53. PubMed ID: 10416415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
