These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673435)

  • 1. Interception of the Pseudo-Class I using a rotational headgear tube.
    De Baets J
    J Clin Orthod; 1995 Apr; 29(4):244-56. PubMed ID: 7673435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical and oblique headgear: a comparison of treatment effects.
    O'Reilly MT; Nanda SK; Close J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 8506811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biomechanical aspects of the space gaining therapy according to Cetlin].
    Ferro A; Mignogna RE; Chimenti C
    Minerva Stomatol; 2004 Mar; 53(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 15107783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Class II correction with the modified sagittal appliance and maxillary second molar extraction.
    Aras A
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 10961784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The headgear: an effective functional appliance adjunct to treatment of the common Class II malocclusion in the adolescent--a clinical perspective.
    DeAngelis V
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2009; 58(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 19526912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reciprocal mini-chin cup for selected Class II malocclusions.
    Langlade M
    J Clin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 31(12):787-98. PubMed ID: 9511585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guiding occlusal development with functional appliances.
    Nielsen IL
    Aust Orthod J; 1995 Oct; 14(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 9063127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The timing of Class II treatment.
    Wheeler TT; McGorray SP; Dolce C; King GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4 Suppl):S66-70. PubMed ID: 16644421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Early edgewise and interceptive treatment in Angle Class II division 1 in the mixed dentition].
    Aknin JJ
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Oct; 19(4):479-504. PubMed ID: 3869860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of anterior cross-bites in the early mixed dentition.
    Major PW; Glover K
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Jul; 58(7):574-5, 578-9. PubMed ID: 1511366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The American Orthodontics BOS MOrth Cases Prize 2005.
    Houghton N
    J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 35(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 18525073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Interception of class I and II malocclusions].
    Reboul ML
    Ligament; 1981; 19(140):7-14. PubMed ID: 6948145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; de Almeida RR; Janson G; Castanha Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.