These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673592)

  • 1. Objective testing of vergence ranges.
    Wesson MD; Masin LC; Boyles ST
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Jun; 66(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 7673592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children.
    Jiménez R; Pérez MA; García JA; González MD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):528-42. PubMed ID: 15491481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of rotary prism fusional vergence ranges.
    Penisten DK; Hofstetter HW; Goss DA
    Optometry; 2001 Feb; 72(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 11243428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
    Gall R; Wick B
    Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vergence adaptation in children and its clinical significance.
    Wong LC; Rosenfield M; Wong NN
    Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2001; 16(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11240934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses.
    Jainta S; Hoormann J; Jaschinski W
    Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3238-46. PubMed ID: 17959213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and agreement in the measurement of horizontal fusional vergences.
    Antona B; Barrio A; Barra F; Gonzalez E; Sanchez I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):475-91. PubMed ID: 18761485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aging effects on the visually driven part of vergence movements.
    Yang Q; Le TT; Kapoula Z
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1145-51. PubMed ID: 18952920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective study of different test targets for the near point of convergence.
    Pang Y; Gabriel H; Frantz KA; Saeed F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 20444137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vergence adaptation and the order of clinical vergence range testing.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ; Ong E; Super S
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Apr; 72(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 7609946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vergence eye movements facilitated by saccades.
    Oohira A
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1993; 37(4):400-13. PubMed ID: 8145385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resting positions of vergence and their relation to asthenopic complaints.
    Jaschinski W; Walper N
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 17523043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relation between static and dynamic aspects of vergence, estimated with a subjective test using flashed dichoptic nonius lines.
    Jaschinski W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):399-410. PubMed ID: 15315654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of near fusional vergence ranges with rotary prisms and with prism bars.
    Goss DA; Becker E
    Optometry; 2011 Feb; 82(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 21144803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The forced vergence cover test and phoria adaptation.
    Toole AJ; Fogt N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 17718885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism.
    Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directional asymmetry during combined saccade-vergence movements.
    Kumar AN; Han Y; Dell'Osso LF; Durand DM; Leigh RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 93(5):2797-808. PubMed ID: 15625096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective accommodative amplitude and dynamics with the 1CU accommodative intraocular lens.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Naroo S; Gilmartin B; Shah S; Cunliffe IA; Benson MT; Mantry S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1230-5. PubMed ID: 16505063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.