194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673795)
1. Measuring passive cervical motion: a study of reliability.
Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jun; 18(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 7673795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion, revisited.
Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 8792318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of measuring active and passive cervical range of motion: an observer-blinded and randomized repeated-measures design.
Christensen HW; Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Jun; 21(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 9627865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population.
Agarwal S; Allison GT; Singer KP
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Sep; 28(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16182022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring cervical muscle tenderness: a study of reliability.
Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Feb; 18(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 7790788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of a single, digital inclinometric range of motion measurement technique in the assessment of lumbar range of motion.
Stude DE; Goertz C; Gallinger M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994 Feb; 17(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8169547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter- and intrarater reliability of a back range of motion instrument.
Kachingwe AF; Phillips BJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Dec; 86(12):2347-53. PubMed ID: 16344034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study.
Morphett AL; Crawford CM; Lee D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 12704307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.
Christensen HW; Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial.
Nilsson N; Christensen HW; Hartvigsen J
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996; 19(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 8728459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interexaminer reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion.
Zachman ZJ; Traina AD; Keating JC; Bolles ST; Braun-Porter L
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Jun; 12(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 2746145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A reassessment of normal cervical range of motion.
Lantz CA; Klein G; Chen J; Mannion A; Solinger AB; Dvorak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1249-57. PubMed ID: 12811267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.
Petersen CM; Johnson RD; Schuit D
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10903583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal ranges of passive cervical motion for women and men 20-60 years old.
Nilsson N; Hartvigsen J; Christensen HW
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1996 Jun; 19(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 8792319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intertester reliability and diagnostic validity of the cervical flexion-rotation test.
Hall TM; Robinson KW; Fujinawa O; Akasaka K; Pyne EA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 18486750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine.
Smedmark V; Wallin M; Arvidsson I
Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 10903585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
