These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673815)

  • 21. Glide path preparation in S-shaped canals with rotary pathfinding nickel-titanium instruments.
    Ajuz NC; Armada L; Gonçalves LS; Debelian G; Siqueira JF
    J Endod; 2013 Apr; 39(4):534-7. PubMed ID: 23522552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shaping of curved root canals instrumented with stainless steel and nickel titanium files.
    Atlas DM; Leonardi L; Raiden G
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2005; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16302457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Shaping ability of multi-taper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin curved root canal].
    Luo HX; Huang DM; Jia LH; Luo SG; Gao XJ; Tan H; Zhou XD
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 24(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 16999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
    Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
    Chen JL; Messer HH
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 3. Resistance to bending and fracture.
    Tepel J; Schäfer E; Hoppe W
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9594751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nickel-titanium versus stainless-steel finger spreaders in curved canals.
    Berry KA; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):752-4. PubMed ID: 9855827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
    Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
    Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Experimental study of preparing curved root canals with different instrument].
    Yin LY; Xie XL; Chen MM; Liu LH; Ling TY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 26(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 19186866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals.
    Schäfer E; Tepel J; Hoppe W
    J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):493-7. PubMed ID: 8596068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Glide Path Enlargement of Mandibular Molar Canals by Using K-files, the ProGlider File, and G-Files: A Comparative Study of the Preparation Times.
    Paleker F; van der Vyver PJ
    J Endod; 2017 Apr; 43(4):609-612. PubMed ID: 28190589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of computed tomography when comparing nickel-titanium and stainless steel files during preparation of simulated curved canals.
    Garip Y; Günday M
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):452-7. PubMed ID: 11556512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
    Royal JR; Donnelly JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests.
    Kazemi RB; Stenman E; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):500-6. PubMed ID: 11027388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endodontic hand instruments: cutting efficiency, instrumentation of curved canals, bending and torsional properties.
    Tepel J; Schäfer E
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Oct; 13(5):201-10. PubMed ID: 9550049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.