169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673837)
1. A comparison of maintenance of canal curvature using balanced-force instrumentation with three different file types.
Royal JR; Donnelly JC
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):300-4. PubMed ID: 7673837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of nickel-titanium file distortion using electric and air-driven handpieces.
Bortnick KL; Steiman HR; Ruskin A
J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11487167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical analysis of the balanced force technique in endodontics.
Kyomen SM; Caputo AA; White SN
J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):332-7. PubMed ID: 7996094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
Schäfer E
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments.
Esposito PT; Cunningham CJ
J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 7673815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
