These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7673837)

  • 21. An evaluation of the Canal Master, balanced force, and step-back techniques.
    Hankins PJ; ElDeeb ME
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8618093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nickel-titanium versus stainless-steel finger spreaders in curved canals.
    Berry KA; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Nov; 24(11):752-4. PubMed ID: 9855827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel-titanium files.
    Sattapan B; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2000 Mar; 26(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 11199710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison using macroradiography of canal shapes in teeth instrumented ultrasonically and by hand.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Aug; 15(8):339-44. PubMed ID: 2637324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques.
    Backman CA; Oswald RJ; Pitts DL
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1402559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
    Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of three files to prepare curved root canals.
    Bou Dagher FE; Yared GM
    J Endod; 1995 May; 21(5):264-5. PubMed ID: 7673828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals.
    Park H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jun; 91(6):715-8. PubMed ID: 11402288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of torque required to fracture three different nickel-titanium rotary instruments around curves of the same angle but of different radius when bound at the tip.
    Booth JR; Scheetz JP; Lemons JE; Eleazer PD
    J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12540222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickel-titanium files in simulated resin root canals.
    Calberson FL; Deroose CA; Hommez GM; De Moor RJ
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):613-23. PubMed ID: 15317565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals.
    Coleman CL; Svec TA
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of the preparation efficacies of HERO Shaper and Nitiflex root canal instruments in curved root canals.
    Kaptan F; Sert S; Kayahan B; Haznedaroğlu F; Tanalp J; Bayirli G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):636-42. PubMed ID: 16243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shaping ability of Mity Roto 360 degrees and Naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1998 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9641148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
    Campos JM; del Rio C
    J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.